branch

Another git process seems to be running in this repository

匿名 (未验证) 提交于 2019-12-03 07:36:14
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 由 翻译 强力驱动 问题: I'm trying to learn how to use git and have created a small project with an html, css, and javascript file. I made a branch from my basically empty project and then made some changes to my code. I tried staging the changes but I get the following error message: Another git process seems to be running in this repository , e . g . an editor opened by 'git commit' . Please make sure all processes are terminated then try again . If it still fails , a git process may have crashed in this repository earlier : remove the file manually to

Pushing to a remote branch (failed to update ref)

匿名 (未验证) 提交于 2019-12-03 07:36:14
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 问题: I have a remote repository with a feature/initital-change branch. Now I want to push some files to this remote branch from my local feature/initital-change branch. I went through a few posts on pushing to remote branches and tried out a few methods but I am still getting the same error. After adding and committing, I get the following for git status. Sakibs-MacBook-Pro:BluFireLabs SakibArRahman$ git status On branch feature/initial-change Your branch is ahead of 'origin/feature/initial-change' by 1 commit. (use "git push" to publish your

Prepend Git commit message with partial branch name

拟墨画扇 提交于 2019-12-03 07:32:34
问题 My current branch naming convention is as such: ticket-45-my-new-feature-branch-description I am currently using this code in my .git/hooks/prepare-commit-msg file to prepend every commit message with the branch name as such: BRANCH_NAME=$(git branch 2>/dev/null | grep -e ^* | tr -d ' *') if [ -n "$BRANCH_NAME" ] && [ "$BRANCH_NAME" != "master" ]; then echo "[$BRANCH_NAME] $(cat $1)" > $1 fi End result: [ticket-45-my-new-feature-branch-description] test commit What I'm trying to accomplish is

How should gitflow hotfixes work?

ぃ、小莉子 提交于 2019-12-03 06:53:11
We use Gitflow for our web builds, and I have a question about how hotfixes are supposed to work. But first I should explain that we don't quite use the normal Gitflow workflow. I understand that usually you would branch your features , they would merge into develop when finished, you would create your release , release gets merged into master and you deploy that, as an actual "versioned release". However, as this is client work, we don't do "releases", instead features are deployed as and when they are required, so changes from our feature branches are merged into master on an ad-hoc basis.

git — locking master branch for some users?

北城以北 提交于 2019-12-03 06:50:13
问题 I would like to force other team-members to not work on the master-branch but on a development branch. we have a central git-repository where we push our work into. i would like to know if it's possible to block users from pushing changes to the master-branch but only allow certain users to do so. I would like to have the following "workflow" development is always only done with a development-branch the release-manager is responsible for the master branch and only he is allowed to merge stuff

How can I find out which files have been modified in a branch?

核能气质少年 提交于 2019-12-03 06:36:35
问题 I have two branches: master and bug1. I checked out bug1, did bunch of changes and multiple commits. How do I get a list of all files that were changed on the branch? I'm not interested in hashes, dates or any other commit related details. I just want to get a simple list of touched files. 回答1: git diff --name-only master bug1 回答2: From your master: git diff --name-status BRANCH See the git diff man page for details. 来源: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1749323/how-can-i-find-out-which

How do I branch an individual file in SVN?

冷暖自知 提交于 2019-12-03 06:33:11
The subversion concept of branching appears to be focused on creating an [un]stable fork of the entire repository on which to do development. Is there a mechanism for creating branches of individual files? For a use case, think of a common header (*.h) file that has multiple platform-specific source (*.c) implementations. This type of branch is a permanent one. All of these branches would see ongoing development with occasional cross-branch merging. This is in sharp contrast to unstable development/stable release branches which generally have a finite lifespan. I do not want to branch the

Get git branch name in Jenkins Pipeline/Jenkinsfile

好久不见. 提交于 2019-12-03 06:29:24
问题 I've create a jenkins pipeline and it is pulling the pipeline script from scm. I set the branch specifier to ' all ', so it builds on any change to any branch. How do I access the branch name causing this build from the Jenkinsfile? Everything I have tried echos out null except sh(returnStdout: true, script: 'git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD').trim() which is always master . 回答1: If you have a jenkinsfile for your pipeline, check if you see at execution time your branch name in your

What is the optimal range for number of live branches? [closed]

百般思念 提交于 2019-12-03 06:08:01
问题 As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. Closed 6 years ago . Let's say a project is: 1 product built over Y years comprising M modules written in L [1..3] languages developed by total of D

git staging and committing between multiple branches

≯℡__Kan透↙ 提交于 2019-12-03 06:07:40
I clearly do not understand git at all. This is what I'm getting: git branch (outputs that I'm on master) git checkout -b foo echo "next line" >> file (file is an existing file) git add file (stages) git checkout master git status (shows that file has "next line" and is staged!!) git commit (commits the changes that were staged on branch foo!!) git checkout foo Here is the kicker. foo now doesn't show any changes made to file in the working directory OR staged. So looks like - any changes you make, including modifying files and staging, happen to ALL branches. and when you COMMIT to a specific