biztalk-2010

BizTalk 2010 Inbound 997 Routing Errors

╄→尐↘猪︶ㄣ 提交于 2019-12-11 14:12:22
问题 In the system I'm working on, BizTalk 2010 sends out transactions to trading partners and we receive 997s. Every time we receive a 997, I'm seeing a routing error in the administration console. In BizTalk 2006 R2, 997s were received by the EdiReceive pipeline, the reports were updated (if enabled) and then the 997 was terminated if there weren't any explicit subscriptions defined. In other words, the 997 was never forwarded to the message box. So my question is, is there something in the new

The difference between WCF-SQL adapter and Sql Adapter

女生的网名这么多〃 提交于 2019-12-10 23:38:36
问题 I am new to BizTalk development. I am using BizTalk server 2010. I am doing a migration existing code which use BizTalk 2006 to 2010. In the old application we have used Sql adapter to get procedure out put for a xml file. MSDN for the 2010 specifies that BizTalk Server no longer supports the SQL Adapter. Consider using the Microsoft BizTalk Adapter Pack to achieve the same functionality. (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa578608.aspx) But when I install BizTalk 2010 it has the SQL

BizTalk 2010 installation needed for build server (TFS2010)?

拈花ヽ惹草 提交于 2019-12-06 10:41:37
问题 Is a (full) BizTalk 2010 installation needed to let a build server (TFS2010) build BizTalk 2010 solutions/projects ? 回答1: As per my knowledge, BizTalk 2010 installation is not required. You only need below components. Project Build Component available under Additional Software(to build the project) Developer Tools and SDK (to run tests) 回答2: I did find an apparent exception where if you deal with anything EDI related, it seems to require the full BizTalk install(not configuration). I wanted

BizTalk 2010 installation needed for build server (TFS2010)?

浪尽此生 提交于 2019-12-04 16:59:53
Is a (full) BizTalk 2010 installation needed to let a build server (TFS2010) build BizTalk 2010 solutions/projects ? Jehan33 As per my knowledge, BizTalk 2010 installation is not required. You only need below components. Project Build Component available under Additional Software(to build the project) Developer Tools and SDK (to run tests) I did find an apparent exception where if you deal with anything EDI related, it seems to require the full BizTalk install(not configuration). I wanted to add this footnote for people experiencing compile errors where local compile works fine. 来源: https:/

Calling a web/wcf service from orchestration: adding a generated item vs adding service reference

ぐ巨炮叔叔 提交于 2019-12-04 11:32:26
If I want to call a web service or wcf method from an orchestration, I can do it by either adding a service reference to the project or adding a generated item. What is the advantage of either approach - is there a best practice? Steef -Jan Wiggers answers a similar question here TL;DR - Always use the Generated Items wizard . My 10c - Although the .xsd files imported by Add Service is added as a schema and set to BtsCompile, there are some limitations such as: Add Service Reference will add the client proxy, which isn't needed in a BizTalk project (and which might 'tempt' your devs to do

mapping a string containing xml in BizTalk

坚强是说给别人听的谎言 提交于 2019-12-04 01:54:46
问题 I have an xml document with a node that may optionally contain a string of escaped xml. I'd like to be able to transform that content using xsl in a BizTalk map. Any suggestion how? I've tried: msxsl:node-set(string). This creates a nameless single node with no content. The document() function using a url prefix of 'data:text/xml' as suggested by helderdarocha here. for-each selecting the text() of the node containing the string using xpath() in an orchestration to extract the string then

Identifying HL7 V3 schemas for CDA R2

两盒软妹~` 提交于 2019-12-03 13:36:01
问题 The company I work for recently started a project delving into the world of HL7 messaging and data trading. We are using BizTalk Server 2010 with the BTAHL7 accelerator for 2010 with success so far for HL7 v2 but now we have a need to accept HL7 v3 (CDA R2) documents. These are CCD's we will be accepting from an external vendor. I have the full suite of .xsd schemas from HL7 for CDA R2 (all 1541 of them) but am struggling with how to figure out which schemas relate to the messages we will be

Identifying HL7 V3 schemas for CDA R2

泄露秘密 提交于 2019-12-03 03:40:06
The company I work for recently started a project delving into the world of HL7 messaging and data trading. We are using BizTalk Server 2010 with the BTAHL7 accelerator for 2010 with success so far for HL7 v2 but now we have a need to accept HL7 v3 (CDA R2) documents. These are CCD's we will be accepting from an external vendor. I have the full suite of .xsd schemas from HL7 for CDA R2 (all 1541 of them) but am struggling with how to figure out which schemas relate to the messages we will be receiving. All I have to work with are test CCD messages from our trading partner and no other

mapping a string containing xml in BizTalk

[亡魂溺海] 提交于 2019-12-01 11:14:53
I have an xml document with a node that may optionally contain a string of escaped xml. I'd like to be able to transform that content using xsl in a BizTalk map. Any suggestion how? I've tried: msxsl:node-set(string). This creates a nameless single node with no content. The document() function using a url prefix of 'data:text/xml' as suggested by helderdarocha here . for-each selecting the text() of the node containing the string using xpath() in an orchestration to extract the string then make a multipart message. It won't let me use an xmlDocument message as one of the messages in a

Biztalk and the best way to call web service

↘锁芯ラ 提交于 2019-12-01 00:10:11
I am writing a biztalk orchestration that will need to call a web service, probably multiple web services, and probably more than once. I see two options before me; one, consume the wsdl in a separate code project, and call the web services from code in an expression shape, and two, consume it from Biz, get schemas, etc and call through request/response ports. What is the best practice here? On the one hand, if the wsdl is updated it will be easier to update the code than the schemas and ports, and it seems like a lot of clutter and work to build ports enough for multiple web service calls. On