azure-webjobs

I'am trying to integrate a WebJob inside an ADF pipeline. The webjob is a very simple console application: namespace WebJob4 { class ReturnTest { static double CalculateArea(int r) { double area = r * r * Math.PI; return area; } static void Main() { int radius = 5; double result = CalculateArea(radius); Console.WriteLine("The area is {0:0.00}", result); } } } How do we call this webjob through an ADF pipeline and store the response code (HTTP 200 in case of Success) in azure blob storage? Dec 2018 Update : If you are thinking of doing this using azure function, azure data factory NOW provides

I have one console app which will be scheduled as job in AZURE web site. From that console app I want to connect remote SFTP and get all files and save them in my folder inside AZURE web site.Also if it possible remove them from SFTP after transfer. RASKOLNIKOV First of all best and free option to use in this case is WinSCP .NET assembly . You can download it from here So lets start this is the function: public static void GetSftp(string host, string user, string password, int port, string source, string dest, string remoteDest) { Directory.CreateDirectory(dest); var winScpSessionOptions = new

First off, I have looked at the other SO posts with the same error message and none seem to resolve my issue. I have tried many permutations and options. My function builds fine but will not run in the CLI, I get the following cryptic error. The MSFT documentation does not seem to have the answers either. No job functions found. Try making your job classes and methods public. If you're using binding extensions (e.g. ServiceBus, Timers, etc.) make sure you've called the registration method for the extension(s) in your startup code (e.g. config.UseServiceBus(), config.UseTimers(), etc.). I am

I want to use the WebJob SDK in a stateless service running as a Service Fabric application. Unfortunately I’m not able to get it running properly. Below is part of a test code that reproduces the problem. The “ProcessMethod“ is never invoked. The triggered function “ProcessNotificationsInQueue“ is also never executed (yes, there are items in the queue). The “Health State” of the application is set to “Error” in the Service Fabric Explorer although the application is still running. The DashboardConnectionString and StorageConnectionString both have the correct values. I don’t see any problem

I'm in the process of migrating a couple of Jobs that were previously scheduled and run through Quartz.Net to Azure Webjobs. Using Quartz.Net allowed me to have all the (very compact) Job Classes in the same project as the console program entry point initializing the scheduler. Now I would like to retain that structure without having to create a discrete console application project for each and every web job. Is there currently any way to configure a command line argument for continuous web-job that would allow to branch internally to the correct job depending on the command line argument? In

I have the source code hosted in a TFS 2012 on premise installation. When I try to publish my Azure WebJob to Azure from Visual Studio 2015, I get the following error. Error : An error occurred while creating the WebJob schedule: Response status code does not indicate success: 409 (Conflict). The WebJob does get created under the web application, but it is set to On Demand rather than scheduled. When I open Fiddler to try to troubleshoot this issue, I get the following error. Error ERROR_CONNECTION_TERMINATED: Web deployment task failed. (Web Deploy experienced a connection problem with the

I'm deploying a WebJob to Azure using Visual Studio, but none of the subdirectories in the build output folder of the project are copied to Azure (as per looking in the FTP folder and by virtue of the app not executing correctly). Is there any way to get the deploy to copy all the files and folders across? More info: the subdirectories are from a referenced project and the files do have "Copy Always" set. They do appear in the output build directory of the WebJob project UPDATE: So it seems that at some point this was fixed and now works as expected Thank you for reporting this. It looks like