azman

Get list of users belonging to a role using Authorization Manager (AzMan)

此生再无相见时 提交于 2019-12-22 19:44:33
问题 Using ASP.NET (C#) I have set up Authorization Manager to allow me to handle roles on a website. Added users to roles is simple Roles.AddUserToRole("DOMAIN\\UserName", "role") . However I want to list the users belonging to a role, but since they are stored as SID's, displaying them would not be that helpful. To get the users, I am thinking XML would have to be used, although is it possible to use COM Interop to both do that and get the user name? Either way, how can I get the users belonging

Get list of users belonging to a role using Authorization Manager (AzMan)

痴心易碎 提交于 2019-12-22 19:44:10
问题 Using ASP.NET (C#) I have set up Authorization Manager to allow me to handle roles on a website. Added users to roles is simple Roles.AddUserToRole("DOMAIN\\UserName", "role") . However I want to list the users belonging to a role, but since they are stored as SID's, displaying them would not be that helpful. To get the users, I am thinking XML would have to be used, although is it possible to use COM Interop to both do that and get the user name? Either way, how can I get the users belonging

NetSqlAzMan vs AzMan vs (?????)

安稳与你 提交于 2019-12-21 07:21:12
问题 I've been trying to "read between the lines" about the original (and/or current) motivation for the NetSqlAzMan project. Was this written for? An adapter for Windows Authorization Manager (AzMan). Where the methods in the NetSqlAzMan just passes calls to (Windows Authorization Manager (AzMan)), but perhaps with nicer/cleaner methods? A replacement for (Windows Authorization Manager (AzMan)). Where (most or all of) the features available in (Windows Authorization Manager (AzMan)) are recreated

Authorization and Entitlement solution on .Net like earlier in AzMan

元气小坏坏 提交于 2019-12-21 02:58:13
问题 What is the best way to achieve application authorization and entitlement in .Net. Earlier AzMan use to be the standard way. With the advent of provider model, at least roles are taken care of but I am not sure about the authorization & entitlement. I am looking at the ability to define and access operation level permissions for roles / users. What is the most suitable way to achieve the above? 回答1: According to this blog post the ClaimsAuthorizationManager API is 'next generation of AzMan'.

Where is microsoft.interop.security.azroles on Server 2008 R2?

倾然丶 夕夏残阳落幕 提交于 2019-12-19 09:33:09
问题 As far as I can recall, on Server 2003, microsoft.interop.security.azroles used to live in "C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\authman". On Server 2008 R2, that folder is empty. Anyone know where it's hiding? 回答1: I had the same problem, myself. They've put it back in the GAC, in both 32-bit and 64-bit flavours: gacutil /l Microsoft.Interop.Security.AzRoles Microsoft (R) .NET Global Assembly Cache Utility. Version 4.0.30319.1 Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. The Global Assembly

Automated testing of authorization scenarios implemented with AzMan

我只是一个虾纸丫 提交于 2019-12-12 01:17:17
问题 I have a web application that uses AzMan authorization to grant different functionality to different users. I've just started using WatiN to implement some automated web UI tests that run under Visual Studio Team System/TFS. I'd like to be able to use it to verify the different authorization scenarios. To do this though I'd need to be able to run different tests as different users who are granted differing rights through AzMan (using dummy test accounts). Does anyone have experience with

Calling initialize method of AzMan object causes FileNotFoundException

﹥>﹥吖頭↗ 提交于 2019-12-08 05:14:13
问题 I have A WCF service that has a class that inherits System.Web.Security.RoleProvider. In this class I use Authorization Manager (AzMan) - using AzRoles.dll - for role management. Authentication is in an ADAM instance. I have been having trouble with my service under load and it seemed like I need to change the service so that the AzMan store was opened and closed for each call - otherwise objects were not being released and eventually the app pool would crash - at least that is what seems to

My project builds with MSBuild 4 but not with MSBuild 3.5 even though I'm targeting the same version of the .NET Framework (3.5)?

给你一囗甜甜゛ 提交于 2019-12-06 06:48:00
问题 When I build my solution using MSBuild 4 it compiles successfully: C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\MSBuild.exe MySolution.sln Build succeeded. 0 Warning(s) 0 Error(s) But when I try to do the same using MSBuild 3.5 I get the following error, even though the source is the same and I am using the same libraries and the same version of the .NET Framework. C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v3.5\MSBuild.exe MySolution.sln error CS1501: No overload for method

My project builds with MSBuild 4 but not with MSBuild 3.5 even though I'm targeting the same version of the .NET Framework (3.5)?

邮差的信 提交于 2019-12-04 12:44:07
When I build my solution using MSBuild 4 it compiles successfully: C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\MSBuild.exe MySolution.sln Build succeeded. 0 Warning(s) 0 Error(s) But when I try to do the same using MSBuild 3.5 I get the following error, even though the source is the same and I am using the same libraries and the same version of the .NET Framework. C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v3.5\MSBuild.exe MySolution.sln error CS1501: No overload for method 'InitializeClientContextFromStringSid' takes '2' arguments error CS1501: No overload for method 'GetRoles' takes '0' arguments

NetSqlAzMan vs AzMan vs (?????)

独自空忆成欢 提交于 2019-12-04 00:24:18
I've been trying to "read between the lines" about the original (and/or current) motivation for the NetSqlAzMan project. Was this written for? An adapter for Windows Authorization Manager (AzMan). Where the methods in the NetSqlAzMan just passes calls to (Windows Authorization Manager (AzMan)), but perhaps with nicer/cleaner methods? A replacement for (Windows Authorization Manager (AzMan)). Where (most or all of) the features available in (Windows Authorization Manager (AzMan)) are recreated in NetSqlAzMan, but the code was developed independently. (Perhaps to provide DotNet 4.0 support???)