postfix-notation

what is benefits for changing from infix to postfix?

[亡魂溺海] 提交于 2019-12-06 06:18:57
I read book today. It introduced algorithm about chaning from infix to postfix.. What is benefits? Thanks in advance. Well for one, you can easily evaluate a postfix expression in a single scan from left to right with the help of a stack, unlike evaluating infix expressions. and second, there is no need of the concept of parentheses and precedence rules etc. in a postfix expression. I think infix is really easy to understand for human. Postfix is the good way for machine to process. Please prefer: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~pjj/cs2121/fix.html An advanced example that also illustrates the

Shunting-yard algorithm in c++

﹥>﹥吖頭↗ 提交于 2019-12-06 01:48:57
I need a function that takes an infix string (like "3 + 4 * 9"), and convert it to postfix (like "4 9 * 3 +"). I got it working until you throw in parentheses within parentheses. I've been working on it all day and can't figure out what I'm doing wrong- can someone with a fresh mind see it, maybe? I feel like I'm really close! Thanks! Here's the code: string ExpressionManager::infixToPostfix(string infixExpression) { cout << "itop Testing : " << infixExpression << endl; string posnums = "0123456789"; string posops = "+-*/%(){}[]"; string onlyops = "+-/%*"; string space = " "; string openbra =

May I write {x,a,b}//Do[…,#]& instead of Do[…,{x,a,b}]?

泄露秘密 提交于 2019-12-05 20:44:26
问题 I'm in love with Ruby. In this language all core functions are actually methods. That's why I prefer postfix notation – when the data, which I want to process is placed left from the body of anonymous processing function, for example: array.map{...} . I believe, that it has advantages in how easy is this code to read. But Mathetica, being functional (yeah, it can be procedural if you want) dictates a style, where Function name is placed left from the data. As we can see in its manuals, // is

How to put postfix expressions in a binary tree?

痞子三分冷 提交于 2019-12-05 06:30:28
so i have a binary tree and a postfix expression "6 2 * 3 /" what is the algo to put it in a tree? like, [/] / \ [*] [3] / \ [6] [2] To construct a tree from the expression, pretend you are evaluating it directly but construct trees instead of calculating numbers. (This trick works for many more things than postfix expressions.) Algorithm: Have a stack to store intermediate values (which are trees), and examine each token from left to right: If it is a number, turn it into a leaf node and push it on the stack. If it is an operator, pop two items from the stack, construct an operator node with

Convert from an infix expression to postfix (C++) using Stacks

那年仲夏 提交于 2019-12-05 03:15:24
My lecturer gave me an assignment to create a program to convert and infix expression to postfix using Stacks. I've made the stack classes and some functions to read the infix expression. But this one function, called convertToPostfix(char * const inFix, char * const postFix) which is responsible to convert the inFix expression in the array inFix to the post fix expression in the array postFix using stacks, is not doing what it suppose to do. Can you guys help me out and tell me what I'm doing wrong? The following is code where the functions to convert from inFix to postFix is and

Scala Postfix operator warning contradicts with Scaladoc

蓝咒 提交于 2019-12-04 21:51:38
My code: val exitStatus = url #> outfile ! scala.sys.process : new URL("http://www.scala-lang.org/") #> new File("scala-lang.html") ! Warning: postfix operator ! should be enabled [warn] by making the implicit value scala.language.postfixOps visible. [warn] This can be achieved by adding the import clause 'import scala.language.postfixOps' [warn] or by setting the compiler option -language:postfixOps. [warn] See the Scaladoc for value scala.language.postfixOps for a discussion [warn] why the feature should be explicitly enabled. [warn] val exitStatus = url #> outfile ! [warn] ^ [warn] one

small language in python

你。 提交于 2019-12-04 05:53:59
I'm writing what might not even be called a language in python. I currently have several operators: + , - , * , ^ , fac , @ , !! . fac computes a factorial, @ returns the value of a variable, !! sets a variable. The code is below. How would I go about writing a way to define functions in this simple language? EDIT: i updated the code! import sys, shlex, readline, os, string List, assign, call, add, sub, div, Pow, mul, mod, fac, duf, read,\ kill, clr, STO, RET, fib, curs = {}, "set", "get", "+", "-", "/", "^", "*",\ "%", "fact", "func", "read", "kill", "clear", ">", "@", "fib", "vars" def fact

Shunting-Yard VS Recursive Descent Parser

人盡茶涼 提交于 2019-12-04 04:48:56
问题 I am building an advanced mathematical parser and would like to know the difference between Shunting-Yard and the other available parser algorithms like "Descent Parser" knowing that I prefer to store the formula in RPN notation. Thanks in advance, 回答1: I've never had much use for the "shunting yard" algorithm because it seems focused on just infix expressions. Recursive descent parsing easily does expressions and most of what you want to do with more complex parsers. Being more general, I

May I write {x,a,b}//Do[…,#]& instead of Do[…,{x,a,b}]?

半城伤御伤魂 提交于 2019-12-04 04:33:33
I'm in love with Ruby. In this language all core functions are actually methods. That's why I prefer postfix notation – when the data, which I want to process is placed left from the body of anonymous processing function, for example: array.map{...} . I believe, that it has advantages in how easy is this code to read. But Mathetica, being functional (yeah, it can be procedural if you want) dictates a style, where Function name is placed left from the data. As we can see in its manuals, // is used only when it's some simple Function, without arguments, like list // MatrixForm . When Function

C# generated IL for ++ operator - when and why prefix/postfix notation is faster

半城伤御伤魂 提交于 2019-12-03 08:40:04
问题 Since this question is about the increment operator and speed differences with prefix/postfix notation, I will describe the question very carefully lest Eric Lippert discover it and flame me! (further info and more detail on why I am asking can be found at http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/FastLessCSharpIteration.aspx?msg=3899456#xx3899456xx/) I have four snippets of code as follows:- (1) Separate, Prefix: for (var j = 0; j != jmax;) { total += intArray[j]; ++j; } (2) Separate, Postfix: for