Javascript unescape() vs. Python urllib.unquote()

為{幸葍}努か 提交于 2019-11-30 17:16:14

问题


From reading various posts, it seems like JavaScript's unescape() is equivalent to Pythons urllib.unquote(), however when I test both I get different results:

In browser console:

unescape('%u003c%u0062%u0072%u003e');

output: <br>

In Python interpreter:

import urllib
urllib.unquote('%u003c%u0062%u0072%u003e')

output: %u003c%u0062%u0072%u003e

I would expect Python to also return <br>. Any ideas as to what I'm missing here?

Thanks!


回答1:


%uxxxx is a non standard URL encoding scheme that is not supported by urllib.parse.unquote() (Py 3) / urllib.unquote() (Py 2).

It was only ever part of ECMAScript ECMA-262 3rd edition; the format was rejected by the W3C and was never a part of an RFC.

You could use a regular expression to convert such codepoints:

try:
    unichr  # only in Python 2
except NameError:
    unichr = chr  # Python 3

re.sub(r'%u([a-fA-F0-9]{4}|[a-fA-F0-9]{2})', lambda m: unichr(int(m.group(1), 16)), quoted)

This decodes both the %uxxxx and the %uxx form ECMAScript 3rd ed can decode.

Demo:

>>> import re
>>> quoted = '%u003c%u0062%u0072%u003e'
>>> re.sub(r'%u([a-fA-F0-9]{4}|[a-fA-F0-9]{2})', lambda m: chr(int(m.group(1), 16)), quoted)
'<br>'
>>> altquoted = '%u3c%u0062%u0072%u3e'
>>> re.sub(r'%u([a-fA-F0-9]{4}|[a-fA-F0-9]{2})', lambda m: chr(int(m.group(1), 16)), altquoted)
'<br>'

but you should avoid using the encoding altogether if possible.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23158822/javascript-unescape-vs-python-urllib-unquote

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!