`auto` return type in context of class members

白昼怎懂夜的黑 提交于 2019-11-28 12:25:45

If you want to use return type deduction, you cannot separate the declaration and definition into different files (not unless everyone includes both). There's no workaround for this other than to use an actual type.

When C++ goes to compile code that calls func, it must be able to know, at that time, what it will return. Without having definition in that translation unit, the compiler cannot know what will be returned. And therefore, the compiler cannot compile that code. And C++'s compilation model does not allow it to use information from other translation units in this way.

The best you might be able to do is wait for modules, which may be able to get around this.

Don't think of return type deduction as a way to never have to write return types. It's a feature intended for circumstances where the return type is awkward to write, where the most reasonable way to write it is as a decltype(expr), and expr is the exact expression you're going to return. And those cases are typically in template code, which has to go into headers anyway. If the return type is simple and obvious to you, there's really little reason not to put it there. Don't use return type deduction by default.

标签
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!