Why are primitive types such as Int erased to Object in Scala?

问题

In Scala,

{ x: Option[Int] => x }
   .getClass
   .getMethod("apply", classOf[Option[_]])
   .getGenericParameterTypes

returns Array(scala.Option<java.lang.Object>). I'd initially been expecting to see instead Array(scala.Option<scala.Int>), but I see that scala.Int is a value class (extends AnyVal) 'whose instances are not represented as objects by the underlying host system'.

I still don't understand the erasure to Object, though. Couldn't it be the much more useful java.lang.Integer?

回答1:

Couldn't it be the much more useful java.lang.Integer?

Yes, and that was even the case, once. Unfortunately, that leads to broken type signatures. That is, it is impossible to generate correct bytecode in all situations if Int is erased to java.lang.Integer.

There isn't a single ticket or commit about this, but the one that changed this particular behavior is SI-4214, in this commit.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11167430/why-are-primitive-types-such-as-int-erased-to-object-in-scala