问题
I'm new to reactive extensions (rx) and try to do the following thing in .NET (but should be the same in JS and other languages.):
I have a stream incoming with objects containing a string and a bool property. The stream would be infinite. I have the following conditions:
- The first object should always be printed.
- Now all incoming objects should be skipped until an object arrives with the bool property set to "true".
- When an object arrives with the bool property set to "true", this object should be skipped but the next object should be printed (no matter what the properties are).
- Now it goes on this way, every object that follows an object with the property set to true should be printed.
Example:
("one", false)--("two", true)--("three", false)--("four", false)--("five", true)--("six", true)--("seven", true)--("eight", false)--("nine", true)--("ten", false)
Expected result:
"one"--"three"--"six"--"seven"--"eight"--"ten"
Beware that "six" and "seven" have been printed because they follow an object with the property set to true, even if their own property is also set to "true".
Simple .NET program to test it:
using System;
using System.Reactive.Linq;
using System.Threading;
namespace ConsoleApp1
{
class Program
{
class Result
{
public bool Flag { get; set; }
public string Text { get; set; }
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var source =
Observable.Create<Result>(f =>
{
f.OnNext(new Result() { Text = "one", Flag = false });
Thread.Sleep(1000);
f.OnNext(new Result() { Text = "two", Flag = true });
Thread.Sleep(1000);
f.OnNext(new Result() { Text = "three", Flag = false });
Thread.Sleep(1000);
f.OnNext(new Result() { Text = "four", Flag = false });
Thread.Sleep(1000);
f.OnNext(new Result() { Text = "five", Flag = true });
Thread.Sleep(1000);
f.OnNext(new Result() { Text = "six", Flag = true });
Thread.Sleep(1000);
f.OnNext(new Result() { Text = "seven", Flag = true });
Thread.Sleep(1000);
f.OnNext(new Result() { Text = "eight", Flag = false });
Thread.Sleep(1000);
f.OnNext(new Result() { Text = "nine", Flag = true });
Thread.Sleep(1000);
f.OnNext(new Result() { Text = "ten", Flag = false });
return () => Console.WriteLine("Observer has unsubscribed");
});
}
}
}
I tried to use the .Scan and .Buffer extensions but I don't know how exactly to use them in my scenario.
Performance of course should be as good as possible, cause in the end the stream would be infinite.
回答1:
Try this approach:
var results = new[]
{
new Result() { Text = "one", Flag = false },
new Result() { Text = "two", Flag = true },
new Result() { Text = "three", Flag = false },
new Result() { Text = "four", Flag = false },
new Result() { Text = "five", Flag = true },
new Result() { Text = "six", Flag = true },
new Result() { Text = "seven", Flag = true },
new Result() { Text = "eight", Flag = false },
new Result() { Text = "nine", Flag = true },
new Result() { Text = "ten", Flag = false },
};
IObservable<Result> source =
Observable
.Generate(
0, x => x < results.Length, x => x + 1,
x => results[x],
x => TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1.0));
The above just produces the source in a more idiomatic way than your Observable.Create<Result> approach.
Now here's the query:
IObservable<Result> query =
source
.StartWith(new Result() { Flag = true })
.Publish(ss =>
ss
.Skip(1)
.Zip(ss, (s1, s0) =>
s0.Flag
? Observable.Return(s1)
: Observable.Empty<Result>())
.Merge());
The use of .Publish here allows the source observable to have only one subscription, but for it to be used multiple times within the .Publish method. Then the standard Skip(1).Zip approach can be used to inspect the subsequent values being produced.
Here's the output:
After inspiration from Shlomo, here's my approach using .Buffer(2, 1):
IObservable<Result> query2 =
source
.StartWith(new Result() { Flag = true })
.Buffer(2, 1)
.Where(rs => rs.First().Flag)
.SelectMany(rs => rs.Skip(1));
回答2:
Here's a number of ways to do it:
var result1 = source.Publish(_source => _source
.Zip(_source.Skip(1), (older, newer) => (older, newer))
.Where(t => t.older.Flag == true)
.Select(t => t.newer)
.Merge(_source.Take(1))
.Select(r => r.Text)
);
var result2 = source.Publish(_source => _source
.Buffer(2, 1)
.Where(l => l[0].Flag == true)
.Select(l => l[1])
.Merge(_source.Take(1))
.Select(l => l.Text)
);
var result3 = source.Publish(_source => _source
.Window(2, 1)
.SelectMany(w => w
.TakeWhile((r, index) => (index == 0 && r.Flag) || index == 1)
.Skip(1)
)
.Merge(_source.Take(1))
.Select(l => l.Text)
);
var result4 = source
.Scan((result: new Result {Flag = true, Text = null}, emit: false), (state, r) => (r, state.result.Flag))
.Where(t => t.emit)
.Select(t => t.result.Text);
I'm partial to the Scan one, but really, up to you.
回答3:
I've found a way to do it thanks to the answer of @Picci:
Func<bool, Action<Result>> printItem = print =>
{
return data => {
if(print)
{
Console.WriteLine(data.Text);
}
};
};
var printItemFunction = printItem(true);
source.Do(item => printItemFunction(item))
.Do(item => printItemFunction = printItem(item.Flag))
.Subscribe();
However, I'm not quite sure if this is the best way since it seems a little strange to me not to use Subscribe() but side-effects. In the end i don't only want to print the values but also call a Webservice with it.
回答4:
This is the way I would code it in TypeScript
const printItem = (print: boolean) => {
return (data) => {
if (print) {
console.log(data);
}
};
}
let printItemFunction = printItem(true);
from(data)
.pipe(
tap(item => printItemFunction(item.data)),
tap(item => printItemFunction = printItem(item.printBool))
)
.subscribe()
The basic idea is to use an higher level function, printItem, which returns a function that knows if and what to print. The function returned is stored in a variable, printItemFunction.
For each item emitted by the source Observable, the first thing to be done is to execute printItemFunction passing the data notified by the source Observable.
The second thing is to evaluate printItem function and store the result in the variable printItemFunction so that it is ready for the following notification.
At the beginning of the program, printItemFunction is initialized with true, so that the first item is always printed.
I am not familiar with C# to give you an answer for .NET
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51944853/take-first-elements-of-stream-after-previous-element-matches-condition