问题
As the evaluation of logical operators && and || are defined as "short circuit", I am assuming the following two pieces of code are equivalent:
p = c || do_something();
and
if (c) {
p = true;
}
else {
p = do_something();
}
given p and c are bool, and do_something() is a function returning bool and possibly having side effects. According to the C standard, can one rely on the assumption the snippets are equivalent? In particular, having the first snippet, is it promised that if c is true, the function won't be executed, and no side effects of it will take place?
回答1:
After some search I will answer my question myself referencing the standard: The C99 standard, section 6.5.14 Logical OR operator is stating:
Unlike the bitwise | operator, the || operator guarantees left-to-right evaluation; there is a sequence point after the evaluation of the first operand. If the first operand compares unequal to 0, the second operand is not evaluated.
And a similar section about &&.
So the answer is yes, the code can be safely considered equivalent.
回答2:
Yes, you are correct in your thinking. c || do_something() will short-circuit if c is true, and so will never call do_something().
However, if c is false, then do_something() will be called and its result will be the new value of p.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31437095/conditional-execution-based-on-short-circuit-logical-operation