Haskell - How to write (.) f f = (\x -> f (f x))

*爱你&永不变心* 提交于 2019-12-08 02:41:23

问题


I need to write on a module to be run on GHCi, with a function composition to the same function. This (The classic fog(x) = f(g(x))) runs:

(.) f g = (\x -> f (g x)). 

The problem appears when I try to write it like this

(.) f f = (\x -> f (f x)).   (fof(x) = f(f(x)))

GHCi says:

"Conflicting definitions for `f'
 Bound at: Lab1.hs:27:9
           Lab1.hs:27:12"

Line 27:9 appear on the first time f and line 27:12 appear f again.

Why doesn't Haskell understand (.) f f = (\x -> f (f x))?


回答1:


In Haskell, arguments to a function must have unique names. Using the same name for another argument is not allowed. This is because

foo x y = ...    ===    foo = (\x-> (\y-> ...))

and if y where replaced with x, the second x would just shadow the first inside the ... body: there would be no way to reference the first x from there.

You can just define twice f x = f (f x):

Prelude> :t twice
twice :: (t -> t) -> t -> t
Prelude> twice (+1) 4
6


Alternatively, f (f x) = (.) f f x = join (.) f x:

Prelude Control.Monad> :t join (.)
join (.) :: (b -> b) -> b -> b

join is defined in Control.Monad. For functions, it holds that join g x = g x x. It is also known as W combinator.

E.g. print $ join (.) (+1) 4 prints 6.




回答2:


As the error message says, you have conflicting definitions for f in the definition (.) f f = (\x -> f (f x)). You are binding the name f to both the first and second arguments to (.), so ghci doesn't know which argument to use when evaluating the expression f x.

There is nothing wrong with defining (.) using the pattern (.) f g, and then calling it with two arguments that happen to be the same.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25966257/haskell-how-to-write-f-f-x-f-f-x

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!