问题

Case1

@Transactional
public class UserServiceImpl implements UserService {

    ...................
    public void method1(){
        try{
            method2();
        }catch(Exception e){

        }
    }
    public void method2(){

    }
}

Case2

public class UserServiceImpl implements UserService {

    ...................
    public void method1(){
        try{
            method2();
        }catch(Exception e){

        }
    }
    @Transactional
    public void method2(){

    }
}

In case1 if any exception occurs it rollback is working, but in case 2 it's not working. Is there any performance issues if I follow the case1?

回答1:

In case 1 @Transactional is applied to every individual method. In case 2 @Transactional is only applied to method2(), not on method1()

Case 1: - Invoking method1() -> a transaction is started. When method1() calls method2() no new transaction is started, because there is already one

Case 2: - Invoking method1() -> no transaction is started. When method1() calls method2() NO new transaction is started. This is because @Transactional does not work when calling a method from within the same class. It would work if you would call method2() from another class.

From the spring reference manual:

In proxy mode (which is the default), only external method calls coming in through the proxy are intercepted. This means that self-invocation, in effect, a method within the target object calling another method of the target object, will not lead to an actual transaction at runtime even if the invoked method is marked with @Transactional. Also, the proxy must be fully initialized to provide the expected behaviour so you should not rely on this feature in your initialization code, i.e. @PostConstruct.

回答2:

@Transactionalon a class applies to each method on the service. It is a shortcut. Typically, you can set @Transactional(readOnly = true) on a service class, if you know that all methods will access the repository layer. You can then override the behavior with @Transactional on methods performing changes in your model. Performance issues between 1) and 2) are not known.

回答3:

Suppose you have the following class:

@Transactional(readOnly = true)
public class DefaultFooService implements FooService {

  public Foo getFoo(String fooName) {
    // do something
  }

  // these settings have precedence for this method
  @Transactional(readOnly = false, propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW)
  public void updateFoo(Foo foo) {
    // do something
  }
}

The @Transactional annotation on the class level will be applied to every method in the class.

However, when a method is annotated with @Transactional (like, updateFoo(Foo foo)) this will take precedence over the transactional settings defined at the class level.

More info:

Transaction management in Spring

回答4:

Quoting from here

The Spring team's recommendation is that you only annotate concrete classes with the @Transactional annotation, as opposed to annotating interfaces.

Since this mechanism is based on proxies, only 'external' method calls coming in through the proxy will be intercepted. This means that 'self-invocation', i.e. a method within the target object calling some other method of the target object, won't lead to an actual transaction at runtime even if the invoked method is marked with @Transactional!

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23132822/what-is-the-difference-between-defining-transactional-on-class-vs-method

标签

java