NOTE: If you experience this issue as well, please upvote it on Apache JIRA:
I have come to an astonishing conclusion that this:
Element e = (Element) document.getElementsByTagName("SomeElementName").item(0);
String result = ((Element) e).getTextContent();
Seems to be an incredible 100x faster than this:
// Accounts for 30%, can be cached
XPathFactory factory = XPathFactory.newInstance();
// Negligible
XPath xpath = factory.newXPath();
// Negligible
XPathExpression expression = xpath.compile("//SomeElementName");
// Accounts for 70%
String result = (String) expression.evaluate(document, XPathConstants.STRING);
I'm using the JVM's default implementation of JAXP:
org.apache.xpath.jaxp.XPathFactoryImpl
org.apache.xpath.jaxp.XPathImpl
I'm really confused, because it's easy to see how JAXP could optimise the above XPath query to actually execute a simple getElementsByTagName() instead. But it doesn't seem to do that. This problem is limited to around 5-6 frequently used XPath calls, that are abstracted and hidden by an API. Those queries involve simple paths (e.g. /a/b/c, no variables, conditions) against an always available DOM Document only. So, if an optimisation can be done, it will be quite easy to achieve.
My question: Is XPath's slowness an accepted fact, or am I overlooking something? Is there a better (faster) implementation? Or should I just avoid XPath altogether, for simple queries?
I have debugged and profiled my test-case and Xalan/JAXP in general. I managed to identify the big major problem in
org.apache.xml.dtm.ObjectFactory.lookUpFactoryClassName()
It can be seen that every one of the 10k test XPath evaluations led to the classloader trying to lookup the DTMManager instance in some sort of default configuration. This configuration is not loaded into memory but accessed every time. Furthermore, this access seems to be protected by a lock on the ObjectFactory.class itself. When the access fails (by default), then the configuration is loaded from the xalan.jar file's
META-INF/service/org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
configuration file. Every time!:
Fortunately, this behaviour can be overridden by specifying a JVM parameter like this:
-Dorg.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager=
org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMManagerDefault
or
-Dcom.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.dtm.DTMManager=
com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.dtm.ref.DTMManagerDefault
The above works, as this will allow to bypass the expensive work in lookUpFactoryClassName() if the factory class name is the default anyway:
// Code from com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.dtm.ObjectFactory
static String lookUpFactoryClassName(String factoryId,
String propertiesFilename,
String fallbackClassName) {
SecuritySupport ss = SecuritySupport.getInstance();
try {
String systemProp = ss.getSystemProperty(factoryId);
if (systemProp != null) {
// Return early from the method
return systemProp;
}
} catch (SecurityException se) {
}
// [...] "Heavy" operations later
So here's a performance improvement overview for 10k consecutive XPath evaluations of //SomeNodeName against a 90k XML file (measured with System.nanoTime():
measured library : Xalan 2.7.0 | Xalan 2.7.1 | Saxon-HE 9.3 | jaxen 1.1.3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
without optimisation : 10400ms | 4717ms | | 25500ms
reusing XPathFactory : 5995ms | 2829ms | |
reusing XPath : 5900ms | 2890ms | |
reusing XPathExpression : 5800ms | 2915ms | 16000ms | 25000ms
adding the JVM param : 1163ms | 761ms | n/a |
note that the benchmark was a very primitive one. it may well be that your own benchmark will show that saxon outperforms xalan
I have filed this as a bug to the Xalan guys at Apache:
Not a solution, but a pointer to the main problem: The slowest part of the process for evaluating an xpath in relation to an arbitrary node is the time it takes the DTM manager to find the node handle:
If the node in question is at the end of the Document, it can end up walking the entire tree to find the node in question, for each and every query.
This explains why the hack to orphan out the target node works. There should be a way to cache these lookups, but at this point I can't see how.
To answer your question, vtd-xml is way faster than Jaxen or Xalan) (I would say on average 10x, and 60x has been reported...
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6340802/java-xpath-apache-jaxp-implementation-performance