Should I denormalize or run multiple queries in DocumentDb?

﹥>﹥吖頭↗ 提交于 2019-12-05 20:20:11

问题


I'm learning about data modeling in DocumentDb. Here's where I need some advice

Please see what my documents look like down below.

I can take two approaches here both with pros and cons.

Scenario 1:

If I keep the data denormalized (see my documents below) by keeping project team member information i.e. first, last name, email, etc. in the same document as the project, I can get the information I need in one query BUT when Jane Doe gets married and her last name changes, I'd have to update a lot of documents in the Projects collection. I'd also have to be extremely careful in making sure that all collections with documents that contain employee information get updated as well. If, for example, I update Jane Doe's name in Projects collection but forget to update the TimeSheets collection, I'd be in trouble!

Scenario 2:

If I keep data somewhat normalized and keep only EmployeeId in the project documents, I can then run three queries whenever I want to get a projects list:

  • Query 1 returns projects list
  • Query 2 would give me EmployeeId's of all project team members that appear in the first query
  • Query 3 for employee information i.e. first, last name, email, etc. I'd use the result of Query 2 to run this one

I can then combine all the data in my application.

The problem here is that DocumentDb seems to have a lot of limitations now. I may be reading hundreds of projects with hundreds of employees in project teams. Looks like there's no efficient way to get all employee information whose Id's appear in my second query. Again, please keep in mind that I may need to pull hundreds of employee information here. If the following SQL query is what I'd use for employee data, I may have to run the same query a few times to get all the information I need because I don't think I can have hundreds of OR statements:

SELECT e.Id, e.firstName, e.lastName, e.emailAddress
FROM Employees e
WHERE e.Id = 1111 OR e.Id = 2222

I understand that DocumentDb is still in preview and some of these limitations will be fixed. With that said, how should I approach this problem? How can I efficiently both store/manage and retrieve all project data I need -- including project team information? Is Scenario 1 a better solution or Scenario 2 or is there a better third option?

Here's what my documents look like. First, the project document:

{
   id: 789,
   projectName: "My first project",
   startDate: "9/6/2014",
   projectTeam: [
      { id: 1111, firstName: "John", lastName: "Smith", position: "Sr. Engineer" },
      { id: 2222, firstName: "Jane", lastName: "Doe", position: "Project Manager" }
   ]
}

And here are two employee documents which reside in the Employees collection:

{
   id: 1111,
   firstName: "John",
   lastName: "Smith",
   dateOfBirth: "1/1/1967',
   emailAddresses: [
      { email: "jsmith@domain1.com", isPrimary: "true" },
      { email: "john.smith@domain2.com", isPrimary: "false" }
   ]
},
{
   id: 2222,
   firstName: "Jane",
   lastName: "Doe",
   dateOfBirth: "3/8/1975',
   emailAddresses: [
      { email: "jane@domain1.com", isPrimary: "true" }
   ]
}

回答1:


I believe you're on the right track in considering the trade-offs between normalizing or de-normalizing your project and employee data. As you've mentioned:

Scenario 1) If you de-normalize your data model (couple projects and employee data together) - you may find yourself having to update many projects when you update an employee.

Scenario 2) If you normalize your data model (decouple projects and employee data) - you would have to query for projects to retrieve employeeIds and then query for the employees if you wanted to get the list of employees belonging to a project.

I would pick the appropriate trade-off given your application's use case. In general, I prefer de-normalizing when you have a read-heavy application and normalizing when you have a write-heavy application.

Note that you can avoid having to make multiple roundtrips between your application and the database by leveraging DocumentDB's store procedures (queries would be performed on DocumentDB-server-side).

Here's an example store procedure for retrieving employees belonging to a specific projectId:

function(projectId) {
  /* the context method can be accessed inside stored procedures and triggers*/
  var context = getContext();
  /* access all database operations - CRUD, query against documents in the current collection */
  var collection = context.getCollection();
  /* access HTTP response body and headers from the procedure */
  var response = context.getResponse();

  /* Callback for processing query on projectId */
  var projectHandler = function(documents) {
    var i;
    for (i = 0; i < documents[0].projectTeam.length; i++) {
      // Query for the Employees
      queryOnId(documents[0].projectTeam[i].id, employeeHandler);
    }
  };

  /* Callback for processing query on employeeId */
  var employeeHandler = function(documents) {
    response.setBody(response.getBody() + JSON.stringify(documents[0]));
  };

  /* Query on a single id and call back */
  var queryOnId = function(id, callbackHandler) {
    collection.queryDocuments(collection.getSelfLink(),
      'SELECT * FROM c WHERE c.id = \"' + id + '\"', {},
      function(err, documents) {
        if (err) {
          throw new Error('Error' + err.message);
        }
        if (documents.length < 1) {
          throw 'Unable to find id';
        }
        callbackHandler(documents);
      }
    );
  };

  // Query on the projectId
  queryOnId(projectId, projectHandler);
}

Even though DocumentDB supports limited OR statements during the preview - you can still get relatively good performance by splitting the employeeId-lookups into a bunch of asynchronous server-side queries.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25706515/should-i-denormalize-or-run-multiple-queries-in-documentdb

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!