问题
I have a list that contains non specific amount of elements but every first element of the nested list is an identifier, I would like to use that identifier to sort the list in order
list = [['D', 'F', 'E', 'D', 'F', 'D'],['A', 'F', 'E', 'C', 'F', 'E'],['C', 'E', 'E', 'F', 'E', 'E'],['B', 'F', 'E', 'D', 'F', 'F']]
After its sorted
list = [['A', 'F', 'E', 'C', 'F', 'E'],['B', 'F', 'E', 'D', 'F', 'F'],['C', 'E', 'E', 'F', 'E', 'E'],['D', 'F', 'E', 'D', 'F', 'D']]
I am using python 3.3.3
回答1:
Python automatically sorts lists of lists by the first element. For example:
lol=[[1,2,3],[5,6,7],[0,9,9]]
sorted(lol)
[[0, 9, 9], [1, 2, 3], [5, 6, 7]]
回答2:
You want to use .sort() or sorted:
>>> t = [['D', 'F', 'E', 'D', 'F', 'D'], ['A', 'F', 'E', 'C', 'F', 'E'], ['C', 'E', 'E', 'F', 'E', 'E'], ['B', 'F', 'E', 'D', 'F', 'F']]
>>> t.sort(key=lambda x: x[0]) # changes the list in-place (and returns None)
>>> t
[['A', 'F', 'E', 'C', 'F', 'E'], ['B', 'F', 'E', 'D', 'F', 'F'], ['C', 'E', 'E', 'F', 'E', 'E'], ['D', 'F', 'E', 'D', 'F', 'D']]
Also note that your list needs commas between its elements. Here is the result for sorted:
>>> sorted(t) # does not change the list but returns the sorted list
[['A', 'F', 'E', 'C', 'F', 'E'], ['B', 'F', 'E', 'D', 'F', 'F'], ['C', 'E', 'E', 'F', 'E', 'E'], ['D', 'F', 'E', 'D', 'F', 'D']]
As you can see, the latter example sorts the lists without any key argument. The former example can as well; but you mention that only the first element is a unique identifier, so there is no way to tell what the secondary criteria might be for sorting the list beyond the first element.
回答3:
lists.sort(key = lambda x: x[0])
Make sure you put commas between each list in the larger list.
回答4:
Essentially the same as the others but uses operator.itemgetter(),
from operator import itemgetter
first_item = itemgetter(0)
new_list = sorted(original_list, key = first_item)
回答5:
You shouldn't overwrite the builtin list constructor, list, use another name instead like this:
>>> a_list = [['D', 'F', 'E', 'D', 'F', 'D'],['A', 'F', 'E', 'C', 'F', 'E'],['C', 'E', 'E', 'F', 'E', 'E'],['B', 'F', 'E', 'D', 'F', 'F']]
To sort the list in place, use the list.sort method:
>>> a_list.sort()
>>> a_list
[['A', 'F', 'E', 'C', 'F', 'E'], ['B', 'F', 'E', 'D', 'F', 'F'], ['C', 'E', 'E', 'F', 'E', 'E'], ['D', 'F', 'E', 'D', 'F', 'D']]
The built-in function, sorted, returns a new list, which is something you didn't seem to want to do. It returns a new list, which if you no longer need the old list would waste space in memory.
Python automatically sorts on the first element. It then automatically sorts on the second, third, and so on. Using lambda as others suggested would mean you would only sort on the first element, and the following elements would be ignored.
>>> a_list = [['b', 'f'],['b', 'e'],['b', 'd'],['a', 'c'],['a', 'b'],['a', 'a'],]
>>> a_list.sort(lambda x,y : cmp(x[0], y[0]))
>>> a_list
[['a', 'c'], ['a', 'b'], ['a', 'a'], ['b', 'f'], ['b', 'e'], ['b', 'd']]
This is why the sort is described as a stable sort
>>> help(list.sort)
Help on method_descriptor:
sort(...)
L.sort(cmp=None, key=None, reverse=False) -- stable sort *IN PLACE*;
cmp(x, y) -> -1, 0, 1
回答6:
Use this
list.sort(lambda x,y : cmp(x[0], y[0]))
UPDATE It works for 2.7 but not for Python 3.3
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21068315/python-sort-first-element-of-list