I was searching a lot through Qt forums and Google for the last few days, but I could not find any obvious answer to this question.
I found the -prefix option (not even documented on Windows) that can be supplied to configure to specify different install directory, but this is not clear separation of the sources and binaries at all, since the build is still done in the source directory and then the files needed for installation are copied to the install directoy. I tried this -prefix option, and came to some problems. (i.e It doesn't copy the .pdb files to the install directory.)
Then I found this link about doing shadow builds but it has the big limitation that the build dir must be at the same level as the source dir.
I'm guessing you didn't try make install? So try that. It should install Qt to a separate directory away from the sources.
Are you saying that after I do configure, I should do nmake install instead just nmake? I know that nmake will process the generated makefiles from qmake and will place them in the source Qt dir, but what nmake install will exactly do i.e in which directory will install the files and how to specify the directory where the files will be installed.
Note that I already do this:
configure -prefix builddir -platform win32-msvc2005
nmake install
The effect of the above two lines was that qt was compiled in the source dir and not directly to my builddir specified with prefix. Then the compiled files were copied in my builddir. I was hoping for something that will build my Qt files directly to the build dir, cause this way I stil need 4 Gb space for my source dir during the compilation. Also the pdb files were not copied to my buildir which is another issue.
Basically, you just have to run configure.exe from your build directory. For example:
mkdir \qt\4.5.2-build
cd \qt\4.5.2-build
set PATH=%cd%\bin;%PATH%
\qt\4.5.2-sources\configure.exe -platform win32-msvc2005
Where sources are in \qt\4.5.2-sources, that would cause the build to go into \qt\4.5.2-build on the current drive.
Also, you must have perl in your PATH, ActiveState Perl is suggested.
I had not previously heard of this limitation where the build and source directories must be at the same level. If you hit this problem you could try working around it by creating a symbolic link (see mklink command).
IIRC on Windows, you have to do a sandbox install, you can't do the UNIX-typical "make install".
There are two options usually for building Qt, -prefix-install and -prefix /foo
You pick one, so if -prefix doesn't allow you to type make install, then I guess on Windows you have to use the -prefix-install route, which is a sandboxed install to the directory you extract Qt to.
I'm guessing you didn't try make install? So try that. It should install Qt to a separate directory away from the sources.
At least the problem with the missing include files (e.g. qscriptengine.h) may by solved by temporary adding \qt\4.5.2-sources\include\Qt to the include path.
I moved the shadow build out of my home folder to a folder in C: and it worked. I know it's weird, but that's what happened. I suspect it must be a bug in syncqt.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1245011/how-to-build-qt-out-of-source