C#: No implict conversion from Class<Child> to Class<Base>

烈酒焚心 提交于 2019-11-26 17:07:33

问题


Following snippet wouldn't compile. With following error:

Cannot implicitly convert type 'Container<ChildClass>' to 'Container<BaseClass>'

class BaseClass {}
class ChildClass : BaseClass {}
class Container<T> where T : BaseClass {}
class Program {
    static void Main() {
        // why doesn't this work?
        Container<BaseClass> obj = new Container<ChildClass>(); 
    }
}

Is this by design? If it is, what is the reason?


回答1:


(made wiki, in case of dups)

C# (3.0) doesn't support covariance of lists etc. C# 4.0 will support limited [co|contra]variance, but still not lists.

The problem is that with:

Container<BaseClass> obj = new Container<ChildClass>(); 

I could do:

obj.Add(new SomeOtherSubclass()); // SomeOtherSubclass : BaseClass

which would compile, but not work.

This behaviour is supported for arrays, but largely for historic reasons.




回答2:


Yo,

If you want the killer article on covariance/contravariance on C#, check out the eric lippert blog, "fabulous adventures in coding". First, this is my favortie blog's name, and second eric wrote the best sequence of articles on (co|contra)variance:

http://blogs.msdn.com/ericlippert/archive/2007/10/16/covariance-and-contravariance-in-c-part-one.aspx

This is as good as Breaking Bad.




回答3:


This is what's knows as covariance / contravariance which isn't available as of C# 3.0. It will be somewhat available in C# 4.0. Here's some info:

http://reddevnews.com/articles/2009/05/01/generic-covariance-and-contravariance-in-c-40.aspx




回答4:


Cannot implicitly convert type Container<ChildClass> to Container<BaseClass>

There is a very common mis-conception that MyClass<Child> inherits from MyClass<Base>.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/981570/c-no-implict-conversion-from-classchild-to-classbase

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!