Rails 3 - Best way to handle nested resource queries in your controllers?

拥有回忆 提交于 2019-12-02 21:24:49

Your current approach is not DRY, and would give you a headache if say, for example, you wanted to impose additional scopes on the index; e.g. pagination, ordering, or searching by a field.

Consider an alternative: Note how your if/elsif/else conditional essentially is just finding the lookup scope to send find to? Why not move that responsibility to a method that does just that? Thus simplifying your actions and removing redundant code.

def index
  respond_with collection
end

def show
  respond_with resource
end

protected

# the collection, note you could apply other scopes here easily and in one place,
# like pagination, search, order, and so on.
def collection
  @locations ||= association.all
  #@locations ||= association.where(:foo => 'bar').paginate(:page => params[:page])
end

# note that show/edit/update would use the same association to find the resource
# rather than the collection
def resource
  @location ||= association.find(params[:id])
end

# if a parent exists grab it's locations association, else simply Location
def association
  parent ? parent.locations : Location
end

# Find and cache the parent based on the id in params. (This could stand a refactor)
#
# Note the use of find versue find_by_id.  This is to ensure a record_not_found
# exception in the case of a bogus id passed, which you would handle by rescuing
# with 404, or whatever.
def parent
  @parent ||= begin
    if id = params[:account_id]
      Account.find(id)
    elsif id = params[:contact_id]
      Contact.find(id)
    end
  end
end

inherited_resources is a great gem for cleanly handling scenarios like this. Written by Jose Valim (of Rails). I believe it should work with HABTM, but honestly I'm not positive if I've ever tried it.

The above exmaple is essentially how inherited_resources works, but mostly it works its magic behind the scenes, and you only overwrite methods if you need to. If it works with HABTM (I think it should), you could write your current controller something like this:

class LocationController < InheritedResources::Base
  belongs_to :contact, :account, :polymorphic => true, :optional => true
end

You shouldn't be providing multiple ways of reaching the same resource. There isn't supposed to be a 1-to-1 mapping of resources to associations.

Your routes file should look like this:

resources :accounts
resources :contacts
resources :locations

The whole point of REST is that each resource has a unique address. If you really want to expose only the accounts/contacts from within a given location, then do so:

resources :locations do
    resources :accounts
    resources :contacts
end

But you absolutely should not be providing both nested accounts/locations and location/accounts routes.

The way I see it, is that since accounts and contacts seems to have a similar behaviour, it would make sense to use Single Table Inheritance (STL) and have another resource, for instance User.

That way you can do this...

class User < ActiveRecord::Base
    has_many :locations
end
class Account < User
end

class Contact < User
end

class Location < ActiveRecord::Base
    has_and_belongs_to_many :user
end

The resources stay the same...

resources :accounts do
    resources :locations
end

resources :contacts do
    resources :locations
end

resources :locations do
    resources :accounts
    resources :contacts
end

Then, you have the same way to access locations, independent of the type of job.

class LocationController < ApplicationController
    def index
        if params[:user_id]
            @locations = Location.find_all_by_account_id(params[:user_id])
        else
            @locations = Location.find_all_by_id(params[:account_id])
        end

        respond_with @locations
    end
end

That way your code becomes reusable, scalable, maintainable and all the other good stuff that we have been told is great.

Hope it helps!

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!