variable-assignment

I have been using the Locals window to check the assignments for procedure level variables. I have recently updated my code to create a set of public-level variables that read certain inputs from the sheets which do not change from project to project. When seeking to check these variables, I do not see them in the Locals window, no doubt because they are not locally-defined variables! Is there an alternative to the Locals Window for Public variables? And if not, how am I supposed to check public variable assignments? In addition to the Immediate window (as described in the other answer), the

Some information source on operator precedence like this says that unary operators like ! , ~ , + , - have higher precedence than assignment = . However, the following expressions are possible: !a = true # => false (with warning) a # => true ~a = 1 # => -2 a # => 1 +a = 1 # => 1 a # => 1 -a = 1 # => -1 a # => 1 Considering these results, the only possible explanation I can think of is that these unary operator have lower precedence than the assignment. If that is the case, then it would mean that the information I mentioned above is wrong. Which is correct? Is there a different explanation? My

I've got some questions about Java's assigment. Strings I've got a class: public class Test { private String s; public synchronized void setS(String str){ s = s + " - " + str; } public String getS(){ return s; } } I'm using "synchronized" in my setter, and avoiding it in my getter, because in my app, there are a tons of data gettings, and very few settings. Settings must be synchronized to avoid inconsistency. My question is: is getting and setting a variable atomic? I mean, in a multithreaded environment, Thread1 is about to set variable s, while Thread2 is about to get "s". Is there any way

I create Groovy objects using this convention... Item item1 = new Item( name: "foo", weight: "150") ...is there a shorthand convention for manipulating properties object? something like this... item1( name: "hello", weight: "175") //this does not work, btw ;-) ...instead of... item1.name = "hello" item1.weight = "175" You have the with method, as described by the great Mr Haki item1.with{ name = "hello" weight = "175" } Yes, you can do it like this: item1.metaClass.setProperties(item1, [name: "hello", weight: "175"]) I prefer item1.with if I have concrete variables to change item1.with { name

I'm currently writing a bash script which loads video files up to to YouTube using GoogleCL . As I'm doing this uploading stuff in a loop (because there can be multiple video files) I would like to check if each file had been uploaded successfully before I upload the next one. The command google youtube post --access unlisted --category Tech $f (where $f represents the file) outputs a string which tells me whether the upload has been successful or not. But I don't know how to redirect that "return string" into a variable to do check the successs. That's what I have: for f in ./*.ogv ./*.mov ./

I am trying to run these two .data files from my c++ code for my assignment. I have been provided with all the files and are meant to only implement a few functions for the program (everything should be able to compile running the make command). I used to run a MAC and only just started using windows (win 7) because work gave me a free laptop. Anyways...I installed cygwin, added the gcc-c++ compiler, gdb and make packages to my cygwin. But when i run the command ./file ./data it comes up with: bash: ./file: cannot execute binary file is there a certain package or something I am suppose to

I have a requirement in which I need to store array of objects in a variable. The objects are of different types. Refer to following example: v := [ {"name":"ravi"}, ["art","coding","music","travel"], {"language":"golang"}, {"experience":"no"} ] Notice the second element is array of string itself. After research, I thought of storing this as interface type like: var v interface{} = [ {"name":"ravi"}, ["art","coding","music","travel"], {"language":"golang"}, {"experience":"no"} ] Still, I am getting few compilation errors which I am not able to find out. What you're asking for is possible --