user-permissions

I just started off with android M and I am unable to access the external storage. I get the following error Caused by: java.lang.SecurityException: Permission Denial: reading com.android.providers.media.MediaProvider uri content://media/external/images/media from pid=15355, uid=10053 requires android.permission.READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE, or grantUriPermission() I am adding user-permission in manifest like <uses-permission android:name="android.permission.WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE" /> and my build file is with following settings : compileSdkVersion 23 buildToolsVersion "22.0.1" minSdkVersion 16

Apart from setting a cookie the first time round, is there a way of detecting whether a user has already given permission for navigator.geolocation to return the lat/long of the browser? If there is, what is it and is it the same across all browsers or different across all browsers? This subject has been partially answered elsewhere According to GeoLocation API – Chrome / Safari – Permission management and Visual Differences , Chrome asks for a revokable one-time permission. I haven't finished reading the article, but it would seem that storage of permissions is not a purely-Chrome thing to do

I have a user foo with the following privileges (it's not a member of any group): { "Statement": [ { "Sid": "Stmt1308813201865", "Action": "s3:*", "Effect": "Allow", "Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::bar" } ] } That user however seem unable to upload or do much of anything until I grant full access to authenticated users (which might apply to anyone). This still doesn't let the user change permission as boto is throwing an error after an upload when it tries to do do key.set_acl('public-read') . Ideally this user would have full access to the bar bucket and nothing else, what am I doing wrong?

I've got an user: user_x that owns a database on postgresql and does not have any ROLE attribute like (CREATE_DB, SUPERUSER,...) This user_x can access the whole DB, create tables (on his database), select, insert and update data. I've got this list of databases: mydatabase=> \l List of databases Name | Owner | Encoding | Collation | Ctype | Access privileges -------------------------+----------+-----------+-----------+-------+----------------------- postgres | postgres | SQL_ASCII | C | C | mydatabase | user_x | UTF8 | C | C | template0 | postgres | SQL_ASCII | C | C | =c/postgres + | | | | |

I've been unable to find a reasonable solution to achieve the following: I wish to have a user that has ALL privileges on a database (or series of databases with the same schema), except for one table, to which they will only have SELECT privileges. Essentially I want the user to have free reign over a database but not to be able to update a specific table. So far I have tried, to no avail: Granting all privileges on that database (db_name.*) and then specifically granting only select privileges on that desired table (hoping it would overwrite the "all", stupid I know). Granting all privileges

I've written a script that takes, as an argument, a string that is a concatenation of a username and a project. The script is supposed to switch (su) to the username, cd to a specific directory based upon the project string. I basically want to do: su $USERNAME; cd /home/$USERNAME/$PROJECT; svn update; The problem is that once I do an su... it just waits there. Which makes sense since the flow of execution has passed to switching to the user. Once I exit, then the rest of the things execute but it doesn't work as desired. I prepended su to the svn command but the command failed (i.e. it didn't