transactions

Does TransactionAttributeType.NOT_SUPPORTED make sense for retrieving entities?

。_饼干妹妹 提交于 2020-01-13 06:35:27
问题 Does having TransactionAttributeType.NOT_SUPPORTED on every DB lookup method makes sense? I don't see the point in having the entity attached if it's not going to execute an update. @TransactionAttribute(TransactionAttributeType.NOT_SUPPORTED) pubic List<AnEntity> getListEntities(){ TypedQuery<AnEntity> query = em.createNamedQuery("AnEntity.myQuery",AnEntity.class); return query.getResultList(); } Does it still end up in the cache? The only time it seems useful to use the REQUIRED transcation

Flutter: Firestore transaction crashes only on physical iOS device

早过忘川 提交于 2020-01-13 05:59:25
问题 I have a simple transaction that updates a Firestore document. It works correctly on Android devices, Android Emulators and iOS emulators, but crashes on a physical iOS device : Firestore.instance.runTransaction((Transaction tx) async { DocumentSnapshot docSnapshot = await tx.get(docRef); tx.update( docRef, { 'title':'A Title' }, ); } Error: -[NSError init] called; this results in an invalid NSError instance. It will raise an exception in a future release. Please call errorWithDomain:code

Does Ehcache 2.1 support the transactional cache concurrency strategy in Hibernate 3.3.2GA?

ε祈祈猫儿з 提交于 2020-01-13 03:15:07
问题 Does Ehcache 2.1 now support the transactional cache concurrency strategy in Hibernate 3.3.2GA? That is, does Hibernate, when configured to use Ehcache 2.1 as its cache provider, allow the <cache usage="transactional"/> element in a mapping file or the Hibernate entity class annotation @Cache(usage=CacheConcurrencyStrategy.READ_WRITE) ? 回答1: According to the Ehcache Home Page page, Ehcache 2.1+ does now support all Hibernate strategies: 17 May 2010: Ehcache 2.1.0 and new ehcache-nonstopcache

Spring @transactional does not start a transaction while testing with JUnit4

限于喜欢 提交于 2020-01-12 14:27:07
问题 I have following configuration. <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:tx="http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.5.xsd http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx/spring-tx.xsd"> <bean id="dataSource" class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource

mysql commit and transaction

扶醉桌前 提交于 2020-01-12 07:46:14
问题 I have a question regarding mysql commits and transactions. I have a couple of php statements that execute mysql queries. Do I just say the following? mysql_query("START TRANSACTION"); //more queries here mysql_query("COMMIT"); What exactly would this do? How does it help? For updates, deletes and insertions I also found this to block other queries from reading: mysql_query("LOCK TABLES t1 WRITE, t2 WRITE"); //more queries here mysql_query("UNLOCK TABLES t1, t2"); Would this block other

Single transaction across multiple threads solution

拟墨画扇 提交于 2020-01-12 07:13:13
问题 As I understand it, all transactions are Thread-bound (i.e. with the context stored in ThreadLocal). For example if: I start a transaction in a transactional parent method Make database insert #1 in an asynchronous call Make database insert #2 in another asynchronous call Then that will yield two different transactions (one for each insert) even though they shared the same "transactional" parent. For example, let's say I perform two inserts (and using a very simple sample, i.e. not using an

Single transaction across multiple threads solution

时光总嘲笑我的痴心妄想 提交于 2020-01-12 07:12:25
问题 As I understand it, all transactions are Thread-bound (i.e. with the context stored in ThreadLocal). For example if: I start a transaction in a transactional parent method Make database insert #1 in an asynchronous call Make database insert #2 in another asynchronous call Then that will yield two different transactions (one for each insert) even though they shared the same "transactional" parent. For example, let's say I perform two inserts (and using a very simple sample, i.e. not using an

Why does PostgreSQL serializable transaction think this as conflict?

走远了吗. 提交于 2020-01-12 06:45:13
问题 In my understanding PostgreSQL use some kind of monitors to guess if there's a conflict in serializable isolation level. Many examples are about modifying same resource in concurrent transaction, and serializable transaction works great. But I want to test concurrent issue in another way. I decide to test 2 users modifying their own account balance, and wish PostgreSQL is smart enough to not detect it as conflict, but the result is not what I want. Below is my table, there're 4 accounts which

Transactional SQL with Sails.js

China☆狼群 提交于 2020-01-12 03:21:11
问题 So I have been playing with NodeJS/Express for a little with now and I would really like to try to rewrite a relatively large side project using a full JavaScript stack just to see how it will work. Sails.js seems to be a pretty good choice for a NodeJS backend for a REST API with support for web sockets which is exactly what I am looking for however is one more issue I am looking to resolve and that is transactional SQL within NodeJS. Most data layer/orms I have seen on the NodeJS side of

Transactional SQL with Sails.js

本秂侑毒 提交于 2020-01-12 03:21:11
问题 So I have been playing with NodeJS/Express for a little with now and I would really like to try to rewrite a relatively large side project using a full JavaScript stack just to see how it will work. Sails.js seems to be a pretty good choice for a NodeJS backend for a REST API with support for web sockets which is exactly what I am looking for however is one more issue I am looking to resolve and that is transactional SQL within NodeJS. Most data layer/orms I have seen on the NodeJS side of