tls1.2

iOS push notifications using TLS certificate vs. using authentication tokens

这一生的挚爱 提交于 2020-05-10 02:38:39
问题 I am reading the documentation for both push using TLS certificates and push using authentication tokens But besides explaining how to configure each, the articles don't really explain the differences or pros/cons of both approaches. Can somebody explain them to me? 回答1: Token-based authentication is newer and essentially simplifies APNS authentication. It is based on a public and private key pair that you can generate on your Apple developer account. Here are the main reasons why it is

Perl “lwp-request” giving error 500 using TLS 1.2

坚强是说给别人听的谎言 提交于 2020-05-09 16:54:10
问题 We've been using a shipping API via our Unix server, specifically SCO Openserver 5.0.7, for a little over a year. Our system generates XML files, sends them to the server using the lwp-request command, receives the response, interprets it, and processes it as needed by our system. The exact command we use is: lwp-request -m POST https://url.com < REQUESTFILE.XML > RESPONSEFILE.XML The shipping company is upgrading all servers to require TLS 1.2, and now I get 500 SSL negotiation failed: as a

Perl “lwp-request” giving error 500 using TLS 1.2

◇◆丶佛笑我妖孽 提交于 2020-05-09 16:53:50
问题 We've been using a shipping API via our Unix server, specifically SCO Openserver 5.0.7, for a little over a year. Our system generates XML files, sends them to the server using the lwp-request command, receives the response, interprets it, and processes it as needed by our system. The exact command we use is: lwp-request -m POST https://url.com < REQUESTFILE.XML > RESPONSEFILE.XML The shipping company is upgrading all servers to require TLS 1.2, and now I get 500 SSL negotiation failed: as a

Perl “lwp-request” giving error 500 using TLS 1.2

我是研究僧i 提交于 2020-05-09 16:51:24
问题 We've been using a shipping API via our Unix server, specifically SCO Openserver 5.0.7, for a little over a year. Our system generates XML files, sends them to the server using the lwp-request command, receives the response, interprets it, and processes it as needed by our system. The exact command we use is: lwp-request -m POST https://url.com < REQUESTFILE.XML > RESPONSEFILE.XML The shipping company is upgrading all servers to require TLS 1.2, and now I get 500 SSL negotiation failed: as a

TFS rest api Invoke-restmethod “The underlying connection was closed: An unexpected error occurred on a receive”

大兔子大兔子 提交于 2020-03-03 11:55:34
问题 I am trying to invoke TFS and/or Azure DevOps REST Api in one of the powershell tasks in release pipeline in Azure DevOps. I tried running the same rest api code in two different servers (w/ azure pipeline agent installed) but one of them is working and one of them returns "The underlying connection was closed: An unexpected error occurred on a receive..". The two agent servers have both tls 1.1 and 1.2 enabled. the working server has powershell v 4.0 and the server that returns error has v5

Java 1.6 + BouncyCastle + TLS1.2 (handshake_failure(40))

安稳与你 提交于 2020-02-29 03:41:28
问题 In my case, I have Java 1.6 and want to connect to a remote server which only supports TLS1.2. Server URL is: https://blagajne-test.fu.gov.si:9002 and certificate public key is here: http://datoteke.durs.gov.si/dpr/files/test-tls.cer I have no possibility to upgrade Java because is a part of Oracle Database 11g (11.4). I tried to write a simple program in Java which uses BouncyCastel libraries but got error: Exception in thread "main" org.bouncycastle.crypto.tls.TlsFatalAlertReceived:

peers not joining channel and error with TLS connection (IP SANs error)

ぐ巨炮叔叔 提交于 2020-02-24 12:16:59
问题 I was trying below architecture in fabric where one peer is on another machine rest of the network set up in first machine(server/system), after creating channel while adding each peer to the channel shows a log as below which was not the case when i tried sample network, the log used to say peer joined to channel, also when i check the logs of peer it says : 2018-02-28 06:51:23.916 UTC [ConnProducer] NewConnection -> ERRO 36b Failed connecting to 138.68.138.161:7050 , error: x509: cannot

OkHttp 3.11 and TLS 1.2 support

生来就可爱ヽ(ⅴ<●) 提交于 2020-02-22 07:18:25
问题 The support for TLS v1.2 was added in Android 4.2, but it wasn't enabled by default. This issue was quite easy to fix with OkHttp 3.x by providing a custom SSLSocketFactory implementation to the OkHttp client: OkHttpClient okHttpClient = new OkHttpClient(); okHttpClient.setSocketFactory(new MySSLSocketFactory()); In my case the custom socket factory was setting the enabled protocols like this: private static final String[] TLS_PROTOCOLS = new String[]{ "TLSv1.1", "TLSv1.2" }; public

Getting javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: Connection closed by peer in Android 5.0.2

徘徊边缘 提交于 2020-02-16 05:22:32
问题 First, I've already searched the internet and have been debugging for 3 days. This is the exact error, javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: Connection closed by peer at com.android.org.conscrypt.NativeCrypto.SSL_do_handshake(Native Method) at com.android.org.conscrypt.OpenSSLSocketImpl.startHandshake(OpenSSLSocketImpl.java:302) at com.android.okhttp.Connection.upgradeToTls(Connection.java:197) at com.android.okhttp.Connection.connect(Connection.java:151) at com.android.okhttp.internal.http

how to terminate ssl at ingress-gateway in istio?

天大地大妈咪最大 提交于 2020-02-15 06:02:21
问题 I am trying to experiment ssl connection in istio ingress gateway. From here istio ssl gateway without termination, i assume that istio ingress gateway by default should terminate ssl. I have installed istio with demo profile, via istioctl. I have also installed my service svc1 . Apart from these, below are what my resources are with routng logic: apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3 kind: Gateway metadata: name: vs-gateway namespace: myns spec: selector: istio: ingressgateway # use istio