this

This question already has an answer here: In Java, what is the difference between this.method() and method()? 9 answers What does “this” mean? [duplicate] 6 answers Here is my code: class StaticBlock { { println("initializer block : " + message); } public StaticBlock(String message) { this.message = message; } private String message; } Now the issue is that, in the initializer block { println("initializer block : " + message); } if I add the this keyword before message , it works, but there is an error when missing this keyword. And the compiler says: StaticBlockDemo.java:34: illegal forward

This question already has an answer here: Should I use the same name for a member variable and a function parameter in C++ 9 answers For example, is this any of the following Bad practice Unreadable Inefficient (the call to this pointer) Any other reason why it's bad to do this . class Person { public: string name; Person(string name) { this->name = name; } }; P.S. How about Person(string name) : name(name) { } The only issue (not a real issue) I can think of is that you can't distinguish member variable with local variable or function parameter . It's just coding style, it's nothing to do

I'm reading this article " Virtual method table " Example in the above article: class B1 { public: void f0() {} virtual void f1() {} int int_in_b1; }; class B2 { public: virtual void f2() {} int int_in_b2; }; class D : public B1, public B2 { public: void d() {} void f2() {} // override B2::f2() int int_in_d; }; B2 *b2 = new B2(); D *d = new D(); In the article, the author introduces that the memory layout of object d is like this: d: D* d--> +0: pointer to virtual method table of D (for B1) +4: value of int_in_b1 B2* b2--> +8: pointer to virtual method table of D (for B2) +12: value of int_in

I have this code $(document).ready(function(){ $('.selector').click(function(){ obj = $(this); obj.replaceWith('<div class="size">whats up man ??!</div>'); alert(obj.html()); }); }); I want to get the new content of 'obj' that has been 'replaceWith' but, I get the old content instead ... how do I get the actual content of 'obj' ??? my intention is to access the new 'obj' $('.selector').click(function(){ var obj = $(this), repl = $('<div class="size">whats up man ??! <span class="medium"></span></div>'); obj.replaceWith(repl); alert(obj.find('span').attr('class')); //this will print 'undefined'

Background: I have a recursive function implemented by a Z-combinator as is shown here and here so it makes no use of arguments.callee since it will be deprecated in upcoming ES6 . Issue The main issue with the Z-combinator and all recursive anonymous functions I've seen so far is that they updates de this value to the inner function scope (the self-returned at the return clause), so the this that references the top level is lost, and I want to maintain it through all the inner functions. Is there a way to maintain the top level this without passing it as an additional function argument, which

The code below successfully fades in one testimonial for 6 seconds, waits 3 seconds, and then fades it out and moves on to the next. Once it reaches the third testimonial it jumps back to the first. This is exactly what I want but on my actual site I have more than three testimonials and in the future may be adding more. I don't want to have to go back and add a new function every time I add a new testimonial. I tried for some time to get this to work using "this" and .next() but failed. I'm hoping someone could make this much more efficient by looping it and getting it to move to the next p

in the following code ( taken from effective C++ ): class A { .... char& operator[](std::size_t position) // now just calls const op[] { return const_cast<char&>( // cast away const on op[]'s return type; static_cast<const TextBlock&>(*this) // add const to *this's type; [position] // call const version of op[] ); } const char& operator[](int index) const { ... } } //complete example, tested with VC 2010 #include<iostream> #include<string> class TextBlock { public: TextBlock(std::string st):text(st){}; TextBlock(char* cstr): text(cstr){}; TextBlock(const TextBlock& r) { std::cout<<"copy