testing

Django Test Database looks empty while test is runnin

感情迁移 提交于 2020-01-22 18:25:21
问题 I have a Django project that uses local PostgreSQL server. I'm using a debugger to debug some weird bugs that I have. While the debugger is stopped on one of the tests, I tried to look at the test database. I see this new database (test_project1) and all the schemes are defined as they should be. But all tables are empty. I know that the tables are not empty: - I used fixture and some tests already ran and returned data. - A post test created new user returned 201 status code. And yet, I see

Python test to check instance type

旧城冷巷雨未停 提交于 2020-01-22 17:06:35
问题 I want to use unittest in python to check if a method returns object of the right class. Every example in the web shows tests for 'type' returned. For example, to check for <type 'list'> or <type 'type'> , we could use: self.assertIsInstance(result, list) self.assertIsInstance(result[0], tuple) What I am looking for is an example to check for <class'sqlalchemy.orm.query.Query'> Would appreciate any help. Thankyou. 回答1: You could use assertIsInstance() , presumably using isinstance() which is

Test cases for string inputs [closed]

情到浓时终转凉″ 提交于 2020-01-22 11:07:39
问题 Closed . This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post. Closed 2 years ago . What are some useful test case ideas (and test questions) related to string inputs? Usefulness need not mean applicable everywhere or all the time--just often enough to be worth considering when you address a new problem/system/domain. Individual answers may contain questions

Test cases for string inputs [closed]

会有一股神秘感。 提交于 2020-01-22 11:03:34
问题 Closed . This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post. Closed 2 years ago . What are some useful test case ideas (and test questions) related to string inputs? Usefulness need not mean applicable everywhere or all the time--just often enough to be worth considering when you address a new problem/system/domain. Individual answers may contain questions

Test cases for string inputs [closed]

こ雲淡風輕ζ 提交于 2020-01-22 11:03:04
问题 Closed . This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post. Closed 2 years ago . What are some useful test case ideas (and test questions) related to string inputs? Usefulness need not mean applicable everywhere or all the time--just often enough to be worth considering when you address a new problem/system/domain. Individual answers may contain questions

Test PHP Script Online [duplicate]

让人想犯罪 __ 提交于 2020-01-22 10:54:25
问题 This question already has answers here : Is there a PHP Sandbox, something like JSFiddle is to JS? [closed] (10 answers) Closed 6 years ago . Last Month codepad.viper-7.com was down and a lot of stackoverflow answers with code pasted there became broken include some of mine. When it was back all scripts where lost. Am looking for a free anonymous alternative to codepad.viper-7.com where i can test php scripts with minimal restriction ( fopen , curl , mb_strlen etc); on different versions.

toBe(true) vs toBeTruthy() vs toBeTrue()

浪子不回头ぞ 提交于 2020-01-22 04:04:47
问题 What is the difference between expect(something).toBe(true) , expect(something).toBeTruthy() and expect(something).toBeTrue() ? Note that toBeTrue() is a custom matcher introduced in jasmine-matchers among other useful and handy matchers like toHaveMethod() or toBeArrayOfStrings() . The question is meant to be generic, but, as a real-world example, I'm testing that an element is displayed in protractor . Which matcher should I use in this case? expect(elm.isDisplayed()).toBe(true); expect(elm

Why does Jest --runInBand speed up tests?

丶灬走出姿态 提交于 2020-01-21 10:35:34
问题 I read that the --runInBand flag speeds up Jest test duration by 50% on CI servers. I can't really find an explanation online on what that flag does except that it lets tests run in the same thread and sequentially. Why does running the test in the same thread and sequentially make it faster? Intuitively, shouldn't that make it slower? 回答1: Reading your linked page and some other related sources (like this github issue) some users have found that: ...using the --runInBand helps in an

“Could not find ApplicationContext, configure Grails correctly first”

不打扰是莪最后的温柔 提交于 2020-01-21 07:43:07
问题 We have a plugin project with some domain classes and services etc. We have an application project which uses the plugin project. This is a common pattern. Integration test (which hit the DB) cant run in the plugin project, as it has no application context, so we run the integration tests in the main application project. We have a very simple integration test: /*@TestFor(Site)*/ class SiteIntegrationSpec extends IntegrationSpec { static transactional=false; def setup() { } def cleanup() { }

Grails 2.0 integration test pollution?

假如想象 提交于 2020-01-21 07:36:26
问题 So i have a small integration test that houses 5 tests in total. Running that test exclusively results in all tests passed. However running my entire test suite results in 4 test failures of the 5. I've just recently upgraded to grails-2.0 from 1.3.7 and i switched from hsqldb to h2. Has anyone any pointers in which direction i should be looking in order to fix this (test-pollution) problem? Domain model Integration test: class SeriesIntegrationTests extends GrailsUnitTestCase { Series series