testing

问题 Are there frameworks that can perform fuzztesting on WebApplications? I know that Selenium and WebDriver are used to build tests for web-applications, but I am particulary interested in libraries, frameworks or projects that have fuzz-testing built-in, so I do not need to re-invent the wheel. For example, I could benefit from these features: randomized link clicking randomized form filling 'back' and 'forward' clicking random mouse movement and clicking javascript support Does anyone know of

问题 I'm new to Docker and was reading up on Docker. It's a great way to test systems in a self contained and reproducible standardized configuration (when done correctly). However, in all the things I've read, there doesn't seem to be too much emphasis on how the testing should occur with docker containers. The docker is used to "contain" the infrastructure and application (code) for easy testing (as well as deployment). But sometimes test codebases are be large and not so simple too. And one can

问题 I'm new to Docker and was reading up on Docker. It's a great way to test systems in a self contained and reproducible standardized configuration (when done correctly). However, in all the things I've read, there doesn't seem to be too much emphasis on how the testing should occur with docker containers. The docker is used to "contain" the infrastructure and application (code) for easy testing (as well as deployment). But sometimes test codebases are be large and not so simple too. And one can

问题 Are there frameworks that can perform fuzztesting on WebApplications? I know that Selenium and WebDriver are used to build tests for web-applications, but I am particulary interested in libraries, frameworks or projects that have fuzz-testing built-in, so I do not need to re-invent the wheel. For example, I could benefit from these features: randomized link clicking randomized form filling 'back' and 'forward' clicking random mouse movement and clicking javascript support Does anyone know of

问题 I'm new to Docker and was reading up on Docker. It's a great way to test systems in a self contained and reproducible standardized configuration (when done correctly). However, in all the things I've read, there doesn't seem to be too much emphasis on how the testing should occur with docker containers. The docker is used to "contain" the infrastructure and application (code) for easy testing (as well as deployment). But sometimes test codebases are be large and not so simple too. And one can

问题 Are there frameworks that can perform fuzztesting on WebApplications? I know that Selenium and WebDriver are used to build tests for web-applications, but I am particulary interested in libraries, frameworks or projects that have fuzz-testing built-in, so I do not need to re-invent the wheel. For example, I could benefit from these features: randomized link clicking randomized form filling 'back' and 'forward' clicking random mouse movement and clicking javascript support Does anyone know of

问题 I'm new to Docker and was reading up on Docker. It's a great way to test systems in a self contained and reproducible standardized configuration (when done correctly). However, in all the things I've read, there doesn't seem to be too much emphasis on how the testing should occur with docker containers. The docker is used to "contain" the infrastructure and application (code) for easy testing (as well as deployment). But sometimes test codebases are be large and not so simple too. And one can

问题 I have a Service Class with 3 methods, Service class is also using some @Autowired annotations. Out of 3 methods, I want to mock two methods but use real method for 3rd one. Problem is: If I am using @Autowired with @Spy, all three real method implementation is being called. If I am using @Spy only, call to real method is return with Null pointer as there is no initialisation of Autowired objects. 回答1: I know about these two options: Use @SpyBean annotation from spring-boot-test as the only

问题 As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. Closed 8 years ago . I was wondering when most people wrote their unit tests, if at all. I usually write tests after writing my initial code to make sure

问题 I have a close function in my component that contains a setTimeout() in order to give time for the animation to complete. public close() { this.animate = "inactive" setTimeout(() => { this.show = false }, 250) } this.show is bound to an ngIf . this.animate is bound to an animation. I have a test that needs to test this function it("tests the exit button click", () => { comp.close() fixture.detectChanges() //verifies the element is no longer in the DOM const popUpWindow = fixture.debugElement