tdd

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Learn more . Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Hi I looking for really good tutorial for iOS TDD, would you please help me! what is the best iOS TDD book, blog --> tutorial (I had different research on google but since I don't have enough knowledge about " iOS TDD " I don't know which one is the best) Thanks in advance! Luis Jacintho There are many stuff about TDD on iOS available on the web.. If you choose using GHUnit, I recommend you using XCode's template

I'm trying to work in a more organised way and started adopting user stories. I think I have misunderstanding of how should I use user stories for technical stuff. Let's say I'm coding an app that gives me the ranking of my site for a certain Keyword in Google. The user story goes like that: As an Internet Marketer I want to find out where my website ranks for a keyword So I'll know whether my SEO efforts work Now this is pretty straight forward and user centric... However, what happens if I need to introduce Proxies into the loop. On one hand, Proxies are technical implementation detail on

Recently I was assigned to a project which was already in its midway. It was TDD environment. Everyone was following right principle of Code Unit Test First and Implementation code later. But couple were doing in reverse, implementation code first and unit test later. Though on a debate they say either way its similiar. What are potential issues may arise if implementation code first and unit test later is followed? Overengineering - you may have written more code than you actually need. Bias - you may write tests that test your implementation rather than the requirement. Tests wont drive your

I am sort of new to TDD. I have started creating the properties I need on the view model as plain auto property. public string Firstname { get; set; } Then I create a test [TestMethod] [Tag("Property")] public void FirstNameTest() { ViewModel = new CustomerViewModel(); ViewModel.PropertyChanged += (s, e) => { Assert.AreEqual("Firstname", e.PropertyName); Assert.AreEqual("Test", ViewModel.Firstname); }; ViewModel.Firstname = "Test"; } Then I would extend the actual implementation to make the test pass like this: public string Firstname { get { return _contact.FirstName; } set { if (_contact

Has anyone got a TDD-ish methodology for designing complex WPF xaml components (i.e., ControlTemplates, Custom Controls with dependency properties)? Is eyeballing the UI the closest you can come to asserting your code is correct? How about incremental development; any aids to dividing up the logic incrementally? If there isn't any methodologies for doing this now, do you think there will be as the platform continues to mature and gain adoption? Cheers, Berryl To be more focused and avoid introductions to TDD, please consider the topic for an audience that is fairly seasoned in applying TDD to

I'm searching for a solution for a weird problem. I have a controller, that needs authentication (with the devise gem). I added the Devise TestHelpers but i can't get it working. require 'test_helper' class KeysControllerTest < ActionController::TestCase include Devise::TestHelpers fixtures :keys def setup @user = User.create!( :email => 'testuser@demomailtest.com', :password => 'MyTestingPassword', :password_confirmation => 'MyTestingPassword' ) sign_in @user @key = keys(:one) end test "should get index" do get :index assert_response :success assert_not_nil assigns(:keys) end test "should get