synchronous

How to read messages in an order from the Queue using MDB?

断了今生、忘了曾经 提交于 2019-12-04 07:47:35
I have a MDB which listens to WebSphere MQ. It does not picks up the messages in the order that has been received by the Queue. How can i make it read it in that order? Is it possible? Should i not use a MDB. In general, WMQ delivers messages in the order that they were received. However, several things can impact that... If the queue is set to priority instead of FIFO delivery and messages arrive in different priorities, they will be delivered "out of order". Distinguish between order produced and order delivered. If the messages are produced on a remote QMgr and there are multiple paths to

.hide(“slow”) is synchronous or Asynchronous method?

雨燕双飞 提交于 2019-12-04 07:26:58
问题 As we know $.ajax() Is a asynchronous method , beacuse next statement starts executing before ajax() method is fully executed and 'ajax()' keep doing his stuff parallelly ,And hide() is a Synchronous method, because it immediately hides the element and next statement will execute when hide() really done his whole task, But I am really confused in the case of hide("slow") . It seems Asynchronous but I read, it sets the timer in browser and everything happen automatically(now hide("slow") is

Obtain data synchronously from WebWorker?

不问归期 提交于 2019-12-04 05:50:46
While I understand that JavaScript is inherently single-threaded and generally frowns upon such things, I am wondering if there is any way to get a WebWorker to wait until some data is made available from the main thread without destroying the call stack of the WebWorker. As this is for a fun project, I can use new technologies and things that won't reliably run on older browsers, and I don't mind esoteric hacks as long as they work. Some other solutions that I have thought about: Continuously poll LocalStorage in a loop until there is data at a predetermined key. This would seem to work

Retrofit 2 synchronous call error handling for 4xx Errors

假如想象 提交于 2019-12-04 03:18:51
I'm using a android-priority-jobqueue and I use retrofit to make synchronous calls to my rest api but i'm unsure how to handle errors like 401 Unauthorized errors which I send back json stating the error. Simple when doing async calls but I'm adapting my app for job manager. below is a simple try catch for IO exceptions, but 401's 422's etc? How to do this? try { PostService postService = ServiceGenerator.createService(PostService.class); final Call<Post> call = postService.addPost(post); Post newPost = call.execute().body(); // omitted code here } catch (IOException e) { // handle error }

Rabbitmq retrieve multiple messages using single synchronous call

喜欢而已 提交于 2019-12-04 02:21:13
Is there a way to receive multiple message using a single synchronous call ? When I know that there are N messages( N could be a small value less than 10) in the queue, then I should be able to do something like channel.basic_get(String queue, boolean autoAck , int numberofMsg ). I don't want to make multiple requests to the server . RabbitMQ's basic.get doesn't support multiple messages unfortunately as seen in the docs . The preferred method to retrieve multiple messages is to use basic.consume which will push the messages to the client avoiding multiple round trips. acks are asynchronous so

How to write a node.js function that waits for an event to fire before 'returning'?

大憨熊 提交于 2019-12-04 00:23:21
问题 I have a node application that is not a web application - it completes a series of asynchronous tasks before returning 1. Immediately before returning, the results of the program are printed to the console. How do I make sure all the asynchronous work is completed before returning? I was able to achieve something similar to this in a web application by making sure all tasks we completed before calling res.end(), but I haven't any equivalent for a final 'event' to call before letting a script

How to make 'http requests' synchronous in Node js

余生颓废 提交于 2019-12-03 21:36:20
I'm trying to execute 3 'http requests'. The problem is, because of the nature of asynchronous mode, it doesn't execute in order. All requests are to internal apis. Here's the sample code :- setInterval(function () { // First request request({}, function (error, response, body) { // Second request request({}, function (error, response, body) { // Third request request({}, function (error, response, body) { }) }) }) },1000); What i'm trying to achieve is get data based on one condition ( First request ), update data ( Second request ) and send sms and emails ( Third request ). Because of the

GWT Synchronous call

送分小仙女□ 提交于 2019-12-03 21:23:23
I have a method in GWT which retrieves the DATA from the DB using the fire method of the requests as you all know its asynchronous I am calling this method from JS so I need to make synchronous is it possible private static String retriveLocation(String part) { ClientFactory clientFactory = GWT.create(ClientFactory.class); MyRequestFactory requestFactory = clientFactory.getRequestFactory(); YadgetRequest request = requestFactory.yadgetRequest(); String criteria = "!" + part; final ArrayList<String> tags = new ArrayList<String>(); request.getTagsStartingWith(criteria, 10, 0).fire( new Receiver

Ajax synchronous callbacks

扶醉桌前 提交于 2019-12-03 20:23:02
I have a pageTest.html in local folder,this page call a service.ashx?i=...(that return value param passed incremented +1) with follow Ajax code: . . getIncr: function(parameters, success){ $.ajax({ async: false, type: methodType, url: getTarget, data: "n="+parameters, dataType:"jsonp", success: success }); } . . The html page call this function for m time (with script..): . var start = function(){ . . var val = 0; . . for(i=0; i<m; i++) { Foo.getIncr(val, function(returned_n){ val = returned_n; }); } }; During the page loading, the calls are execute in "Asynchronous mode" but i setting " async

Starting a process synchronously, and “streaming” the output

荒凉一梦 提交于 2019-12-03 19:52:24
问题 I'm looking at trying to start a process from F#, wait till it's finished, but also read it's output progressively. Is this the right/best way to do it? (In my case I'm trying to execute git commands, but that is tangential to the question) let gitexecute (logger:string->unit) cmd = let procStartInfo = new ProcessStartInfo(@"C:\Program Files\Git\bin\git.exe", cmd) // Redirect to the Process.StandardOutput StreamReader. procStartInfo.RedirectStandardOutput <- true procStartInfo.UseShellExecute