synchronization

How do you avoid duplication of validation on the server and client-side?

只愿长相守 提交于 2019-12-04 18:09:54
问题 How do you avoid duplication of validation on the server and client-side? Is there a web programming platform that generates one from the other, so I don't have to keep the two in sync? 回答1: There are frameworks that can generate the client-side validation from serverside validation configuration. Now I don't know what language or frameworks you are using, but maybe this article can be of help: http://www.emadibrahim.com/2008/09/08/client-server-side-validation-in-aspnet-mvc/ He's using

Clojure STM ( dosync ) x Java synchronize block

会有一股神秘感。 提交于 2019-12-04 18:06:16
问题 What is the difference between Clojure STM (dosync) approach and Java synchronize Block? I'm reading the code below from "The sleeping barber" problem. (http://www.bestinclass.dk/index.clj/2009/09/scala-vs-clojure-round-2-concurrency.html) (defn the-shop [a] (print "[k] entering shop" a) (dosync (if (< (count @queue) seats) (alter queue conj a) (print "[s] turning away customer" a)))) To avoid race conditions, dosync is used, so i ask myself "What is the difference (STM) from Java synchronize

API to set file timestamps in OS X

有些话、适合烂在心里 提交于 2019-12-04 17:52:54
I want to (bidirectionally) synchronize files between a PC (Win7, NTFS) and a Mac (OS X, HFS+). I have tried using a lot of existing tools / methods (Unison, SyncToy or other software working over Samba shares etc.) but none of them are able to preserve the file creation timestamps (hence-forward referred to as FCTs) on my files, which is unacceptable to me. Unison doesn't understand the notion of FCTs, perhaps because it was primarily built with Unix in mind (See my Unison forum post ) Windows cannot get (or set) the FCTs when accessing SMB shares served by OS X. In such scenario, it shows

Futex based locking mechanism

假装没事ソ 提交于 2019-12-04 17:41:07
Somebody can tell me an example of using locking mechanism based on futex? (for muticore x86 CPU, CentOS) Pthreads' mutexes are implemented using futexes on recent versions of Linux. Pthreads is the standard C threading API on Linux, and is part of the Posix standard, so you can easily port your program to other Unix-like systems. You should avoid using futexes directly unless you have very unusual needs, because they're very hard to use correctly - use pthreads, or a higher-level, language-specific API (which will almost certainly use pthreads itself). Have a look at https://github.com/avsm

what if notify() is called before wait()?

别说谁变了你拦得住时间么 提交于 2019-12-04 17:32:58
问题 I have a situation where a notify() 'can' be called before a wait(). I am trying to make a simulator to schedule its next event when I 'notify' him by sending him messages. So I have devised a wait->notify->scedule chain void Broker::pause() { boost::unique_lock<boost::mutex> lock(m_pause_mutex); { std::cout << "pausing the simulation" << std::endl; m_cond_cnn.wait(lock); std::cout << "Simulation UNpaused" << std::endl; // the following line causes the current function to be called at // a

Push IPA to Device via Command Line (after xcodebuild)?

一世执手 提交于 2019-12-04 17:26:55
问题 Is it possible to push an IPA to a device via the command line? The IPA was built from the command line using xcodebuild and signed with a developer certificate. The device is not jail broken and was provisioned for development. In the case of a Bundle being delivered, I fix it up per Ad-Hoc and App Store IPAs with xcrun. I am aware of fruitstrap. I don't want strip the App Bundle from the IPA (fruitstrap requirement), and I don't want the 'debug hook' provided by fruitstrap. The question is

How does threads sleep with interrupt disabled?

本小妞迷上赌 提交于 2019-12-04 17:18:54
I am trying to understand how the code below works. This is straight out of my profs lecture slides. This P() and V() function is the part of semaphore implementation in the OS that we use in class (OS161). I think you might need understanding of the OS161 to answer my question, since its widely used, hopefully some one can answer this questions. My understanding of this code with lecture notes: X:Flow of the P() function 1. When a thread call P(), we disable interrupt 2. check if we have any resources available on sem->count 3.a) if count is 0 then we go to sleep 3.b) if count != 0 then we

Synchronizing databases

*爱你&永不变心* 提交于 2019-12-04 16:57:14
I am developing an Adobe AIR application which stores data locally using a SQLite database. At any time, I want the end user to synchronize his/her local data to a central MySQL database. Any tips, advice for getting this right? Performance and stability is the key (besides security ;)) I can think of a couple of ways: Periodically, Dump your MySQL database and create a new SQLite database from the dump. You can then serve the SQLite database (SQLite databases are contained in a single file) for your users client to download and replace the current database. Create a diff script that generates

Realistic deadlock example in CUDA/OpenCL

时光总嘲笑我的痴心妄想 提交于 2019-12-04 16:50:54
For a tutorial I'm writing, I'm looking for a "realistic" and simple example of a deadlock caused by ignorance of SIMT / SIMD. I came up with this snippet, which seems to be a good example. Any input would be appreciated. … int x = threadID / 2; if (threadID > x) { value[threadID] = 42; barrier(); } else { value2[threadID/2] = 13 barrier(); } result = value[threadID/2] + value2[threadID/2]; I know, it is neither proper CUDA C nor OpenCL C. A simple deadlock that is actually easy to catch by the novice CUDA programmer is when one tries to implement a critical section for a single thread, that

In Java, do I need to declare my collection synchronized if it's read-only?

落爺英雄遲暮 提交于 2019-12-04 16:45:46
问题 I fill a collection one single time when my J2EE webapp starts. Then, several thread may access it at same time but only to read it. I know using a synchronized collection is mandatory for parallels write but do I still need it for parallels read ? 回答1: Normally no because you are not changing the internal state of the collection in this case. When you iterate over the collection a new instance of the iterator is created and the state of the iteration is per iterator instance. Aside note: