super

set title to JFrame

不打扰是莪最后的温柔 提交于 2019-12-01 05:00:26
问题 I am new to Java. My problem is that I have a class names MyClassExp. I have extended it from JFrame. Inside the class, I initiate an object of another class named TabbedFrame. TabbedFrame also extends a class DemoFrame . In DemoFrame, I have the title of the page set using keyword 'super' like: super("Some Title"); Now when I run my MyClassExp, even after creating a JFrame as: new JFrame("New Title"); I'm still getting the same title i.e Some Title. Is there any way to solve this problem? I

Powermock - mocking a super method invocation

自古美人都是妖i 提交于 2019-12-01 04:36:50
问题 Here is my code - import org.junit.Test; import org.junit.runner.RunWith; import org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner; import org.powermock.core.classloader.annotations.*; import static org.powermock.api.support.SuppressCode.*; class BaseService { public int save() { validate(); return 2; } public static int save2() { return 5; } public void validate() { System.out.println("base service save executing..."); } } class ChildService extends BaseService { public int save() { System.out

call to super() must be the first statement in constructor body

痞子三分冷 提交于 2019-12-01 04:11:15
I'm writing the constructor of a LoginRequest class which extends a class called JsobObjectRequest (from the Volley framework in Android, but that's completely irrelevant to the question) With this code : public LoginRequest(String username, String password, Response.Listener<JSONObject> responseListener, Response.ErrorListener errorListener) { Boolean hasCredentials=(username!=null && password!=null); int method=hasCredentials? Method.POST:Request.Method.GET; super(method, API_URL_LOGIN, null, responseListener, errorListener); this.username=username; this.password=password; } I get the error:

Extending Generic Abstract Class & Correct Use of Super

徘徊边缘 提交于 2019-12-01 03:13:24
public abstract class AbstractTool<AT extends AbstractThing> { protected ArrayList<AT> ledger; public AbstractTool() { ledger = new ArrayList<AT>(); } public AT getToolAt(int i) { return ledger.get(i); } // More code Which operates on Ledger ... } public class Tool<AT extends AbstractThing> extends AbstractTool { public Tool() { super(); } } How do I correctly call super to pass the AT generic of Tool to the AbstractTool constructor? It seems no matter what I pick AT to be when I declare Tool (Say, Tool<Thing> ), that I always get back an AbstractThing instead of Thing . This seems to defeat

django templates - using block.super in included template fails (exception)

家住魔仙堡 提交于 2019-12-01 02:48:08
the idea is to to have multiple widgets on a page and include all js and css files needed form this 'widgets' (it's easy to manage files this way). Duplicated files is not a problem. Every widget's template is included into a page by {%include%} From inside widget's template I'm trying to add content to parent's block: PARENT: {%block js%} {%endblock%} WIDGET {%block js%} {{block.super}} ///my widget spectyfic JS {%end block%} this is giving an error with {{block.super}}: Caught AttributeError while rendering: 'BlockNode' object has no attribute 'context' I'm not sure how else can I extend

call to super() must be the first statement in constructor body

你。 提交于 2019-12-01 01:40:34
问题 I'm writing the constructor of a LoginRequest class which extends a class called JsobObjectRequest (from the Volley framework in Android, but that's completely irrelevant to the question) With this code : public LoginRequest(String username, String password, Response.Listener<JSONObject> responseListener, Response.ErrorListener errorListener) { Boolean hasCredentials=(username!=null && password!=null); int method=hasCredentials? Method.POST:Request.Method.GET; super(method, API_URL_LOGIN,

Why [[HomeObject]] is different in shorthand syntax of method?

馋奶兔 提交于 2019-11-30 23:47:23
This question is derived from super keyword unexpected here The accepted answer says: Because super is only valid inside methods. But in MDN , it seems these two are both methods: let person = { greeting() { return "Hello"; } }; let friend = { // shorter syntax for method? greeting() { return super.greeting() + ", hi!"; } // method? // greeting: function() { // return super.greeting() + ", hi!"; // Throw error: Uncaught SyntaxError: 'super' keyword unexpected here // } }; Object.setPrototypeOf(friend, person); console.log(friend.greeting()); In understanding es6 , Nacholas says: Attempting to

Which Android Fragment lifecycle methods require super

荒凉一梦 提交于 2019-11-30 19:24:11
Currently (Android API 17), the only mention of super in the Android Reference on Fragment is casually via some code examples (unlike the Android Reference on Activity , which carefully notes where super is required). SO suggests searching the web as needed, or waiting for a crash, to identify where a call to super is required. I'm asking SO users to share their knowledge on which of the Fragment lifecycle methods require a call to super . Fragment lifecycle methods - require call to super onAttach() onCreate() - presumably yes, as Activity version requires it onCreateView() - seems ok with or

Require override of method to call super

淺唱寂寞╮ 提交于 2019-11-30 16:52:07
I want that when a child class overrides a method in a parent class, the super.method() is called in that child method. Is there any way to check this at compile time? If not, how would I go about throwing a runtime exception when this happens? There's no way to require this directly. What you can do, however, is something like: public class MySuperclass { public final void myExposedInterface() { //do the things you always want to have happen here overridableInterface(); } protected void overridableInterface() { //superclass implemention does nothing } } public class MySubclass extends

super confusing python multiple inheritance super()

坚强是说给别人听的谎言 提交于 2019-11-30 15:11:10
问题 I was playing around with the multiple inheritance in python and I come a cross a situation that I can't understand how it happen. Here is the inheritance layout: A F / \ | B C | \ | / \ | / D The ABCD diamond that everyone familiar with. Plus an extra class "F" I throw it in for fun. Here is the code: class A(object): def foo(self, call_from): print "foo from A, call from %s" % call_from super(A, self).foo("A") class B(A): def foo(self, call_from): print "foo from B, call from %s" % call