strategy-pattern

What is the difference between Strategy design pattern and State design pattern?

混江龙づ霸主 提交于 2019-11-27 10:00:02
What are the differences between the Strategy design pattern and the State design pattern? I was going through quite a few articles on the web but could not make out the difference clearly. Can someone please explain the difference in layman's terms? Honestly, the two patterns are pretty similar in practice, and the defining difference between them tends to vary depending on who you ask. Some popular choices are: States store a reference to the context object that contains them. Strategies do not. States are allowed to replace themselves (IE: to change the state of the context object to

Using a strategy pattern and a command pattern

夙愿已清 提交于 2019-11-27 09:58:50
Both design patterns encapsulate an algorithm and decouple implementation details from their calling classes. The only difference I can discern is that the Strategy pattern takes in parameters for execution, while the Command pattern doesn't. It seems to me that the command pattern requires all information for execution to be available when it is created, and it is able to delay its calling (perhaps as part of a script). What determinations guide whether to use one pattern or the other? I'm including an encapsulation hierarchy table of several of the GoF design patterns to help explain the

When to use C++ private inheritance over composition?

ⅰ亾dé卋堺 提交于 2019-11-27 09:15:29
Can you give me a concrete example when is preferable to use private inheritance over composition? Personally, I will use composition over private inheritance, but there might be the case that using private inheritance is the best solution for a particular problem. Reading the C++ faq , gives you an example on using private inheritance, but I seems easier to use composition + strategy pattern or even public inheritance than private inheritance. private inheritance is typically used to represent "implemented-in-terms-of". The main use I have seen is for mixins using private multiple inheritance

Strategy Pattern with no 'switch' statements?

 ̄綄美尐妖づ 提交于 2019-11-27 09:12:57
问题 I've been doing some reading on the Strategy Pattern, and have a question. I have implemented a very basic Console Application below to explain what I'm asking. I have read that having 'switch' statements is a red flag when implementing the strategy pattern. However, I can't seem to get away from having a switch statement in this example. Am I missing something? I was able to remove the logic from the Pencil , but my Main has a switch statement in it now. I understand that I could easily

Using a strategy pattern and a command pattern

梦想与她 提交于 2019-11-27 04:02:19
问题 Both design patterns encapsulate an algorithm and decouple implementation details from their calling classes. The only difference I can discern is that the Strategy pattern takes in parameters for execution, while the Command pattern doesn't. It seems to me that the command pattern requires all information for execution to be available when it is created, and it is able to delay its calling (perhaps as part of a script). What determinations guide whether to use one pattern or the other? 回答1:

What is the difference between Strategy design pattern and State design pattern?

和自甴很熟 提交于 2019-11-26 22:18:50
问题 What are the differences between the Strategy design pattern and the State design pattern? I was going through quite a few articles on the web but could not make out the difference clearly. Can someone please explain the difference in layman's terms? 回答1: Honestly, the two patterns are pretty similar in practice, and the defining difference between them tends to vary depending on who you ask. Some popular choices are: States store a reference to the context object that contains them.

How does the Strategy Pattern work? [closed]

自作多情 提交于 2019-11-26 19:41:36
How does it work, what is it used for and when should one use it? e-satis Let's explain the strategy pattern the easy way: You have a class Car() with a method run() , so you use it this way in a pseudo language: mycar = new Car() mycar.run() Now, you may want to change the run() behavior on the fly, while the program is executing. For example, you might want to simulate a motor failure or the use of a "boost" button in a video game. There are several ways to do this simulation: using conditional statements and a flag variable is one way. The strategy pattern is another: it delegates the

Strategy pattern with spring beans

拟墨画扇 提交于 2019-11-26 19:10:14
问题 Say I'm using spring, I have the following strategies... Interface public interface MealStrategy { cook(Meat meat); } First strategy @Component public class BurgerStrategy implements MealStrategy { @Autowired CookerDao cookeryDao; @Override public void cook(Meat meat) { cookeryDao.getBurger(meat); } } Next strategy... @Component public class SausageStrategy implements MealStrategy { @Autowired CookerDao cookeryDao; @Override public cook(Meat meat) { return cookeryDao.getSausage(meat); } }

What is the difference between the bridge pattern and the strategy pattern?

百般思念 提交于 2019-11-26 18:57:41
问题 I tried to read many articles on dofactory, wikipedia and many sites. I have no idea on differences between bridge pattern and the strategy pattern. I know both of them decouple an abstraction from its implementation and can change implementation at run time. But I still don't know in which situation I should use strategy or in which situation I should use bridge. 回答1: Semantics. From wikipedia: The UML class diagram for the Strategy pattern is the same as the diagram for the Bridge pattern.

When to use C++ private inheritance over composition?

一个人想着一个人 提交于 2019-11-26 17:49:04
问题 Can you give me a concrete example when is preferable to use private inheritance over composition? Personally, I will use composition over private inheritance, but there might be the case that using private inheritance is the best solution for a particular problem. Reading the C++ faq, gives you an example on using private inheritance, but I seems easier to use composition + strategy pattern or even public inheritance than private inheritance. 回答1: private inheritance is typically used to