stderr

With bash, how can I pipe standard error into another process?

只愿长相守 提交于 2019-11-28 13:20:47
问题 It's well known how to pipe the standard ouput of a process into another processes standard input: proc1 | proc2 But what if I want to send the standard error of proc1 to proc2 and leave the standard output going to its current location? You would think bash would have a command along the lines of: proc1 2| proc2 But, alas, no. Is there any way to do this? 回答1: There is also process substitution. Which makes a process substitute for a file. You can send stderr to a file as follows: process1 2

log syntax errors and uncaught exceptions for a python subprocess and print them to the terminal

China☆狼群 提交于 2019-11-28 12:39:27
The Problem I've been trying to write a program that logs uncaught exceptions and syntax errors for a subprocess. Easy, right? Just pipe stderr to the right place. However , the subprocess is another python program- I'll call it test.py - that needs to run as if its output/errors are not being captured. That is, running the logger program needs to seem like the user has just run python test.py as normal. Further complicating the issue is the problem that raw_input actually gets sent to stderr if readline is not used. Unfortunately, I can't just import readline , since I don't have control over

Making curl send errors to stderr and everything else to stdout

﹥>﹥吖頭↗ 提交于 2019-11-28 11:53:43
Is there a way to tell curl to output errors to stderr, and everything else to stdout? The reason is that I am using curl from the command line (actually a cronjob) to upload a file to an FTP site every evening. Unfortunately because curl outputs status information on stderr, I receive an e-mail about an error when nothing actually went wrong. (I'm redirecting stdout to a log file, but leaving stderr unchanged so that cron will e-mail it to me if there is any output.) There are options to make curl silent, or output everything to stdout, however both these alternatives prevent errors from

解决粘包问题-终极单版本

我的未来我决定 提交于 2019-11-28 09:53:42
服务端: #!/usr/bin/env python# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-import socketimport subprocessimport structimport jsonphone = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)phone.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR,1) # 端口复用phone.bind(('127.0.0.1', 8090))phone.listen(10)while True: # 连接循环 connt , client = phone.accept() print('starting ....') print(client) while True: # 通信循环 try: # 1.收到命令: cmd = connt.recv(1024) if not cmd :continue # 适用于Linux 操作系统 # 2.执行命令: ojb = subprocess.Popen(cmd.decode('utf-8'),shell=True,stdout=subprocess.PIPE,stderr=subprocess.PIPE) stdout = ojb.stdout.read() stderr =

Redirect subprocess stderr to stdout

筅森魡賤 提交于 2019-11-28 09:36:27
I want to redirect the stderr output of a subprocess to stdout. The constant STDOUT should do that, shouldn't it? However, $ python >/dev/null -c 'import subprocess;\ subprocess.call(["ls", "/404"],stderr=subprocess.STDOUT)' does output something. Why is that the case, and how do I get the error message on stdout? A close read of the source code gives the answer. In particular, the documentation is misleading when it says: subprocess.STDOUT Special value that (...) indicates that standard error should go into the same handle as standard output. Since stdout is set to "default" ( -1 ,

Redirect FROM stderr to another file descriptor

大城市里の小女人 提交于 2019-11-28 09:27:23
问题 My program calls library functions which print to stderr. I want to intervene so that all write calls to file descriptor #2 will instead get sent to somewhere else. Here is my first attempt: bool redirect_stderr (int fd) { return dup2 (2, fd) > 0; } Here, fd was successfully obtained from open("/foo/bar",O_APPEND|O_CREAT) After this function returns true, std::cerr<<"blah" goes to the terminal and not to the file. What am I doing wrong? Thanks. UPDATE Thanks, larsmans, but I'm not there yet..

How does Qt5 redirect qDebug() statements to the Qt Creator 2.6 console

旧巷老猫 提交于 2019-11-28 07:39:29
After searching around for a reason that qDebug() statements work fine with Qt's standard message handler but fail when I switch to my own, I'm appealing here to see if anyone else has any experience with the problem. Things I know about / have tried, that do nothing... 1) CONFIG += console 2) DEFINES -= QT_NO_WARNING_OUTPUT QT_NO_DEBUG_OUTPUT 3) ::fprintf(stderr, "ERROR\n"); ::fflush(stderr); 4) ::fprintf(stdout, "OUTPUT\n"); ::fflush(stdout); 5) std::cerr << "CERROR" << std::endl; std::cerr.flush(); However it works correctly when using the built in handler (ie it prints the message to the

How can I reinitialize Perl's STDIN/STDOUT/STDERR?

生来就可爱ヽ(ⅴ<●) 提交于 2019-11-28 07:34:45
I have a Perl script which forks and daemonizes itself. It's run by cron, so in order to not leave a zombie around, I shut down STDIN,STDOUT, and STDERR: open STDIN, '/dev/null' or die "Can't read /dev/null: $!"; open STDOUT, '>>/dev/null' or die "Can't write to /dev/null: $!"; open STDERR, '>>/dev/null' or die "Can't write to /dev/null: $!"; if (!fork()) { do_some_fork_stuff(); } The question I have is: I'd like to restore at least STDOUT after this point (it would be nice to restore the other 2). But what magic symbols do I need to use to re-open STDOUT as what STDOUT used to be? I know that

How to capture a Processes STDOUT and STDERR line by line as they occur, during process operation. (C#)

随声附和 提交于 2019-11-28 07:01:09
问题 I am going to execute a Process (lame.exe) to encode a WAV file to MP3. I want to process the STDOUT and STDERR of the process to display progress information. Do I need to use threading? I can't get my head around it. Some simple example code would be appreciated. Thanks 回答1: If running via the Process class, you can redirect the streams so you may process them. You can read from stdout or stderr synchronously or asynchronously. To enable redirecting, set the appropriate redirection

Python multiprocessing: How can I RELIABLY redirect stdout from a child process?

。_饼干妹妹 提交于 2019-11-28 06:48:33
NB. I have seen Log output of multiprocessing.Process - unfortunately, it doesn't answer this question. I am creating a child process (on windows) via multiprocessing. I want all of the child process's stdout and stderr output to be redirected to a log file, rather than appearing at the console. The only suggestion I have seen is for the child process to set sys.stdout to a file. However, this does not effectively redirect all stdout output, due to the behaviour of stdout redirection on Windows. To illustrate the problem, build a Windows DLL with the following code #include <iostream> extern