static-libraries

Why is it that some static libraries (lib*.a) can be linked in the same way that shared libraries (lib*.so) are linked (ld -l switch), but some can not? I had always been taught that all libraries, static or not, can be linked with -l..., however I've run into one library so far (GLFW), which does nothing but spew "undefined reference" link errors if I attempt to link it this way. According to the response on this question , the "proper" way to link static libraries is to include them directly, along with my own object files, rather than using -l. And, in the case of the GLFW library, this

I have a collection of static libraries (.lib) files one of which may have been built with a different version of Visual Studio. This is causing the code generation of a project that links against all of them to fail. Is there any way to determine which version of Visual Studio was used to compile a static library? James McNellis For release libraries, it's unlikely that you could determine the version. For debug libraries, you can use dumpbin : dumpbin /rawdata:1 library.lib The assembly manifest should be at the beginning of the dump and will contain the version of the CRT the library

I have built my own Static C++ Library, which is built with the settings: Architectures: armv7, armv7s Build Active Architectures Only: No Support Platforms: iOS Valid Architectures: armv7, armv7s The library project builds well and I got the .a file (I have cleaned the build folder and built the project again to be sure my settings were effective). I have added the library (.a file) to my iOS project, but the project won't build even though I have set the exact same settings on the iOS project: Architectures: armv7s, armv7 Build Active Architectures Only: Yes Support Platforms: iOS Valid

I distribute a statically linked binary version of my application on linux. However, on systems with the 2.4 kernel, I get a segfault on startup, and the message: "FATAL: kernel too old." How can I easily get a version up and running with a 2.4 kernel? Some of the libraries I need aren't even available on old linux distributions circa 2003. Is there an apt-get install or something that will allow me to easily target older kernels? The easiest way is to simply install VirtualBox (or something similar, e.g. VMWare),Install CentOS 3 or any suitable old distro with a 2.4 kernel and build/test your

I want incremental updates of my library files to immediately be applied in all of my projects using them, without having to perform an extra step every time for every one of my projects (such as updating a sub-repository or a JAR file). With the library folder in the LIBS_DIR environment variable: // settings.gradle include ':app', ':lib1', ':lib2' project(':lib1').projectDir = new File(System.getenv('LIBS_DIR'), 'lib1') project(':lib2').projectDir = new File(System.getenv('LIBS_DIR'), 'lib2') ‏‏‎ // build.gradle ... dependencies { compile project(path: ':lib1') compile project(path: ':lib2')

I trying to build C library for iOS like the following picture. I have build the liblib.a , but it compile error after I use liblib.a The error log is like the following when I use liblib.a file was built for archive which is not the architecture being linked (armv7): /Users/apk/Desktop/libTest/liblib.a Undefined symbols for architecture armv7: It seems the liblib.a not support for armv7 , but I didn't find the armv7 and the arm64 in Build Setting -> Architectures. How do I build the library of C code for armv7 and use in Objective-C ? ---------------------EDIT--------------------- After I

we are using a java library inside a web application which is hosted in apache server.ReadConfFile method in library returns file not found error.The method is as follows public byte[] ReadConfFile() { try { File file = new File("/home/product/api/conf.txt"); if(!file.exists()) return "file not found".getBytes(); byte[] buf = new byte[(int) file.length()]; FileInputStream fis = new FileInputStream(file); fis.read(buf); return buf; } catch (IOException e) { e.printStackTrace(); return null; } } Is local file system access from web application allowed?. If yes , then is there any access