sortedlist

问题 My List is being sorted by the alphabetical order after sorting by date while I am adding extra 4-5 items in my List with different names. I want to sort my List by date and time only. here I have shared my code please help me to do so. thanks in advance. // Filters All patient to keep only single latest record of each patient id private List<PatientData> filterPatients(List<PatientData> allPatientData) throws ParseException { HashMap<String ,Pair<PatientData,Date>> filtered = new HashMap<>()

问题 My List is being sorted by the alphabetical order after sorting by date while I am adding extra 4-5 items in my List with different names. I want to sort my List by date and time only. here I have shared my code please help me to do so. thanks in advance. // Filters All patient to keep only single latest record of each patient id private List<PatientData> filterPatients(List<PatientData> allPatientData) throws ParseException { HashMap<String ,Pair<PatientData,Date>> filtered = new HashMap<>()

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20480654/can-a-sortedlist-sorteddictionary-with-a-properly-implemented-comparer-be-us

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20480654/can-a-sortedlist-sorteddictionary-with-a-properly-implemented-comparer-be-us

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20480654/can-a-sortedlist-sorteddictionary-with-a-properly-implemented-comparer-be-us

问题 I want to implement the sorted bag(collection) data structure(with a singly-linked list) in C++ and I have a problem when I want to test the add function. This is the test: SortedBag sb(relation1); (relation1 is e1<=e2) sb.add(5); std::cout << sb.size()<<" "; sb.add(6); std::cout << sb.size() << " "; sb.add(0); std::cout << sb.size() << " "; sb.add(5); std::cout << sb.size() << " "; sb.add(10); std::cout << sb.size() << " "; sb.add(8); std::cout << sb.size() << " "; And it will print 1 2 3 3

问题 For the following sorted list: { sorted_list : [{name : <string>,score : <Number>}] } What are the complexities of the following commands (in 'O' notations)? Find: collection.find( { _id: 1}, { sorted_list: { $slice: [ <skip>, <limit> ] } } ) Insert: collection.update( { _id: 1 }, { $push: { sorted_list: { $each: [ { name: 3, score: 8 }, { name: 4, score: 7 }, { name: 5, score: 6 } ], $sort: { score: 1 } } } } ) Remove: collection.update({"sorted_list.name": name},{ $pull: { "sorted_list.name

问题 For the following sorted list: { sorted_list : [{name : <string>,score : <Number>}] } What are the complexities of the following commands (in 'O' notations)? Find: collection.find( { _id: 1}, { sorted_list: { $slice: [ <skip>, <limit> ] } } ) Insert: collection.update( { _id: 1 }, { $push: { sorted_list: { $each: [ { name: 3, score: 8 }, { name: 4, score: 7 }, { name: 5, score: 6 } ], $sort: { score: 1 } } } } ) Remove: collection.update({"sorted_list.name": name},{ $pull: { "sorted_list.name

问题 I am extremely new at writing in VB.NET, and I did not even realise that there was a significant difference between VB.NET and VBA. I have been writing my application in Visual Studio, but I realised that I will need to port it over to VBA in Outlook, and there are some syntax issues that I need to deal with. I have already searched, but I cannot find any sort of definitive reference (like the msdn) for VBA or even VB6, which from what I hear is much closer to VBA than VB.NET. I will include

问题 CHECK UPDATE 3 below I found out the issue I ran into is related to a known serious problem with c# string comparers for .Net 4.0, 4.0 client and 4.5, that will lead to inconsistent sort order of lists of strings (causing the output to depend on the order in the input and the sort algorithm used). The problem was reported to Microsoft in Dec 2012 and closed as "won't be fixed". A work around is available, but is so much slower that it is hardly practical for large collections. While