setter

jQuery Resizable handles setter not working

半城伤御伤魂 提交于 2019-12-02 06:38:34
i'm using jQuery UI Resizable, and i need to set handles option after the initialization. I followed the API example and initialization method works just fine, but setter method seems not working. Am i missing anything? // Initialization works fine! $('#containerGreen').resizable( { handles: "n, e, s, w" } ); // Setter NOT working $('#containerRed').resizable(); $('#containerRed').resizable( "option", "handles", "n, e, s, w" ); Live Demo It's a known bug: http://bugs.jqueryui.com/ticket/3423 Workaround from the issue: A dirty solution is to enable all the handlers that you are going to need on

How to use Builder pattern as described by Joshua Bloch's version in my ModelInput class?

▼魔方 西西 提交于 2019-12-02 02:59:40
I am trying to use Builder Pattern for my below class.. Initially I was using constructor of my class to set all the parameters but accidentally I came across Builder pattern and it is looking good for my use case. Below is my class in which people will mostly pass userId , clientId and parameterMap always but other fields are optional and they may or may not pass it. And also if they are not passing any timeout value, I need to have default timeout value set as 500 always but if they are passing any timeout value then it should override my default timeout value. Here Preference is an ENUM

How to generate a hibernate ID with auto generate with a starting value

核能气质少年 提交于 2019-12-01 16:40:12
问题 Hi I have written code like this @Id @Column(nullable=false) @GeneratedValue(strategy=GenerationType.AUTO) public int getUserID() { return UserID; } But I manually setting it from DAO like "e.setUserID(01);" to insert.Otherwise row not inserting Is there any process to get value to id and retrieve what value generated automatically. Im thinking i will get some help 回答1: Use @GenericGenerator(name="generator", strategy="increment") @GeneratedValue(generator="generator") 回答2: Use the IDENTITY

Setting event handlers inside a Setter.Value structure

本秂侑毒 提交于 2019-12-01 15:57:25
问题 I have a ListView and i'd like to set up a context menu which i can open not only when right-clicking some text in some column but anywhere on the ListViewItem , to do so i thought i'd just set my ContextMenu using a style setter since i cannot directly access the ListViewItem . Unfortunately when you try to do it like this it won't compile: <Style TargetType="ListViewItem"> <Setter Property="ContextMenu"> <Setter.Value> <ContextMenu> <MenuItem Header="Header" Click="Handler"/> ... <

Simple Scala getter/setter override

不羁岁月 提交于 2019-12-01 15:54:28
Let's say we have a class with a 'name' property: class SuperFoo(var name: String) If I wish to override this, to eg add some locking around the calls: class SubFoo(n: String) extends SuperFoo(n) { val lock = new ReentrantLock override def name(): String = { lock.lock try { super.name } finally { lock.unlock } } override def name_=(arg: String): Unit = { lock.lock try { super.name = arg } finally { lock.unlock } } } The above produces a compilation error: super may be not be used on variable name Any ideas how to correctly implement this? (i.e. override the getter & setter to add locking

Simple Scala getter/setter override

可紊 提交于 2019-12-01 14:59:17
问题 Let's say we have a class with a 'name' property: class SuperFoo(var name: String) If I wish to override this, to eg add some locking around the calls: class SubFoo(n: String) extends SuperFoo(n) { val lock = new ReentrantLock override def name(): String = { lock.lock try { super.name } finally { lock.unlock } } override def name_=(arg: String): Unit = { lock.lock try { super.name = arg } finally { lock.unlock } } } The above produces a compilation error: super may be not be used on variable

Setting List items in C# without automatic setter/getter

只愿长相守 提交于 2019-12-01 12:02:29
I'm trying to make a manual setter/getter method in C#, but i'm getting the following error from the "set"-line: Error: The best overloaded method match for 'System.Collections.Generic.ListPackage.Add(Package)' has some invalid arguments private List<Package> packages = new List<Package>(); public List<Package> Packages { set { packages.Add(value); } get { return packages; } } Your code should look like this. private var packages = new List<Package>(); public List<Package> Packages { set { packages = value; } get { return packages; } } If you're trying to use the index getter/setter for some

Limiting access to a public setter to specific objects (C#)

喜夏-厌秋 提交于 2019-12-01 11:54:01
问题 I'm trying to create a class (in C#) that serves as an environment for my application. I'm trying to make the class dynamic, and send it as a parameter to entities in my application. The problem is, that I want to be able to change the properties of this environment class (public setters), but at the same time I want the classes that receive the environment to be unable to use these setters. I can't seem to find a good way to phrase my question (which I figure is a part of the reason I can't

Is it possible to use a setter to return a property to its default value?

自作多情 提交于 2019-12-01 04:21:07
Wondering if that is possible, e.g. if i remove the border from a TextBox and i want to have its default border back when the mouse is over it. <Style TargetType="TextBox"> <Setter Property="BorderBrush" Value="{x:Null}"/> <Style.Triggers> <Trigger Property="IsMouseOver" Value="True"> <Setter Property="BorderBrush" Value="?????"/> </Trigger> </Style.Triggers> </Style> I thought i could use that but in the end it seemed like a bad idea to hide the border, but the question remains. (I know that in this case i could reverse the Trigger to only remove the border if the mouse is not over the

Getters/setters in Java

霸气de小男生 提交于 2019-12-01 02:12:37
I'm new to Java, but have some OOP experience with ActionScript 3, so I'm trying to migrate relying on stuff I know. In ActionScript 3 you can create getters and setters using the get and set keywords, meaning you create a method in the class and access data through a property of an instance of that class. I might sound complicated, but it's not. Here's an example: class Dummy{ private var _name:String; public function Dummy(name:String=null){ this._name = name; } //getter public function get name():String{ return _name; } //setter public function set name(value:String):void{ //do some