robolectric

As the title says. I am aware that there is a limited in memory database provided in robolectric. Is there any way to use this with Active Android? Under the default configuration, it appears that the database is cleared after all the tests are run, but not for each test. Daniel I use greenDao - but the principle is the same. My Application class initialises my DB (the DB has a name). For my tests I subclass Application (which allows Robolectric to call this version instead) and override the method that gets the DB name - and return null. This then means I create an in memory DB. As the

I am using Robolectric 3.0 RC3 for unit testing in Android Studio. And I am getting a ResourceNotFoundException every time I run the test. Please help me resolve the issue. build.gradle dependencies { testCompile 'junit:junit:4.12' compile fileTree(dir: 'libs', include: ['*.jar']) compile 'com.android.support:appcompat-v7:22.0.0' testCompile 'org.mockito:mockito-core:1.9.5' testCompile 'org.robolectric:robolectric:3.0-rc3' compile 'com.ibm.icu:icu4j:53.1' } Test Class @Before public void setUp() throws Exception { activity = Robolectric.buildActivity(MainActivity.class).create().get(); } @Test

This one is kind of a shot in the dark. I'm getting the following error occasionally when running my robolectric unit test suite: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException at java.util.LinkedList$ListItr.checkForComodification(LinkedList.java:966) at java.util.LinkedList$ListItr.next(LinkedList.java:888) at org.robolectric.shadows.ShadowResources.getOverlayedThemeValue(ShadowResources.java:294) at org.robolectric.shadows.ShadowResources.findAttributeValue(ShadowResources.java:284) at org.robolectric.shadows.ShadowResources.attrsToTypedArray(ShadowResources.java:187) at org.robolectric.shadows

Although this question has been answered for previous versions in other threads, none of the answers seems to work for me with api 28 right now so.. All Robolectric tests worked fine when on api 27. Now when my app api target is 28 they all fail. I have @Config(constants = BuildConfig::class, sdk = [Build.VERSION_CODES.P]) on my test class. Diving into Robolectrics internal SdkConfig.java it looks like they add support for api 28: addSdk(Build.VERSION_CODES.P, "P", "4651975", "P"); But when evaluating that line of code in the debugger, Build.VERSION_CODES.P evaluates to 10000 . Not sure what's

How is it possible to produce the same exception like during a real connection-error in robolectric tests? I want to how the program acts if the network is currently not available. Is there a possibility to produce the same exception for my HttpClient? I already tried: Robolectric.getFakeHttpLayer().interceptHttpRequests(false); // with real network to a non existent IP and WifiManager wifiManager = (WifiManager) activity.getSystemService(Context.WIFI_SERVICE); wifiManager.setWifiEnabled(false); and Robolectric.addPendingHttpResponse(404, null); but none of them produces the same reactions

I'm trying to write a test that needs both Robolectric 2.2 and PowerMock , as the code under test depends on some Android libraries and third party libraries with final classes that I need to mock. Given that I'm forced to use the Robolectric test runner through: @RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner.class) ...I cannot use the PowerMock test runner, so I'm trying to go with the PowerMock java agent alternative, without luck so far. I have setup everything according to this guide but I'm facing a collision problem between classes required by the javaagent library and by robolectric through its

I am trying to run robolectric unit test but I am getting error as AndroidManifest.xml not found on path. Can anyone give me an example path of @Config manifest value. Is it relative path or absolute one? Thanks in advance If you are using maven to run your tests you can set as follows: @Config(manifest = "../app/AndroidManifest.xml") @RunWith(RobolectricTestRunner.class) public class SomeTestCase { ... } Please note that if you are using Android Studio/Intellij and want to run your tests within the IDE you will have to make a change in the Run configuration. In Run->Edit configuration-