rmi

I need to develop a Java RMI application for my distributed systems class. During the lecture, the professor was stressing to only let classes implement Serializable that have to be passed by value over the network. This implies that there is some downside or penalty to letting too many classes implement Serializable . Classes that don't require to be sent over the network. I don't see how there could be any downside since the serialization/deserialization would never happen if you never actually send it over the network. What is the penalty for unnecessarily implementing Serializable? There

主节点docker pull脚本： #下载镜像 docker pull registry.cn-hangzhou.aliyuncs.com/liuyi01/kube-controller-manager-amd64:v1.11.0 docker pull registry.cn-hangzhou.aliyuncs.com/liuyi01/kube-proxy-amd64:v1.11.0 docker pull registry.cn-hangzhou.aliyuncs.com/liuyi01/kube-apiserver-amd64:v1.11.0 docker pull registry.cn-hangzhou.aliyuncs.com/liuyi01/kube-scheduler-amd64:v1.11.0 docker pull registry.cn-hangzhou.aliyuncs.com/liuyi01/coredns:1.1.3 docker pull registry.cn-hangzhou.aliyuncs.com/liuyi01/etcd-amd64:3.2.18 docker pull registry.cn-hangzhou.aliyuncs.com/liuyi01/pause:3.1 docker pull registry.cn-hangzhou

I am working on Java RMI. I am having little issue with running my rmiregistry on port 2028 as I allready used that one to run my test program. I can run my program using other port but I would like to know, How we can close rmiregistry running on perticular port ? If you want to do this in programming, we do something like: // create the registry Registry rmiRegistry = LocateRegistry.createRegistry(port); ... // connect to it JMXConnectorServer connector = JMXConnectorServerFactory.newJMXConnectorServer(url, new HashMap<String, Object>(), ManagementFactory.getPlatformMBeanServer()); // do

I'm implementing an hybrid server application that mixes a Web-Servlet and a plain Java application. The java application manages thousands of sockets for remote devices, while the Web application interacts with the user to set/read the state of any socket. Java NIO, or Apache-MINA vs Jboss-Netty , seems to be good options for the sockets application. The first question is, can I run both applications (Servlet with web interface + JAVA NIO application) in the same server? I'am using now Tomcat for the Servlet and a plain procrun daemon for the socket-application I don't know if Spring is

I'm trying to get a RMI program to work. So far, the server starts up correctly but the client fails casting the remote object to the interface. Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0" java.lang.ClassCastException: com.sun.proxy.$Proxy0 cannot be cast to MonitorClient.InterfaceMonitor All other answers I've found are for cases where the end user has cast the equivalent of InterfaceMonitorImpl (unknown to the client) instead of the Interface instead. This is not my case and I'm really at a loss here — RMI is nightmare-ish. Server side Main: InterfaceMonitor obj; try { LocateRegistry

I'm trying to make a Java RMI client/server app. I'm running into problems starting up the server side of my app, as it keeps running into a ClassNotFoundException during the call to the Registry.bind() method when I attempt to start up the server side of the app. I started with the simple tutorial here: http://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/guide/rmi/hello/hello-world.html . After following those instructions, it was initially throwing a ClassNotFoundException complaining that it couldn't find "example.hello.Hello". I was able to resolve that by starting the rmiregistry FROM the destDir