resharper

I wrote about this topic in another question . However, I've since refactored my code to get rid of configuration access, thus allowing the specs to pass. Or so I thought. They run fine from within Visual Studio using TestDriven.Net. However, when I run them during rake using the mspec.exe tool, they still fail with a serialization exception. So I've created a completely self-contained example that does basically nothing except setup fake security credentials on the thread. This test passes just fine in TD.Net, but blows up in mspec.exe. Does anybody have any suggestions? Update: I've

Resharper is killing me for some reason on startup, I just need to get in, is there a command line switch for load without addins? You are probably looking for the /SafeMode command line switch : devenv.exe /SafeMode This will start Visual Studio with all add-ins disabled. 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/885636/how-do-i-disable-plugins-from-command-line-on-visual-studio

I have Visual Studio 2012 with Resharper installed. When editing css files, when I type /* , I get autocompletion like so: /**/ I would like to disable that , but I cannot find it in the options menu. Where can I disable that? Thank you! One way to avoid this annoyance is to add the closing comment symbols first. Go to tools -> options -> text editor -> all languages(or chose one), and untick Automatic brace completion . You can also search for it in options menu. 来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12936215/how-to-disable-autocomplete-in-visual-studio-2012-or-resharper

I need to propagate XML documentation from a base class to derivative(s) or from an interface to implementation(s). Can I do this using Resharper? Jura Gorohovsky Yes you can. If you're yet to implement/override members, then in a derived class or interface implementation, click Alt + Ins , choose "Overriding members" or "Implement missing members". In the wizard that displays afterwards, choose members to implement/override, and make sure to select "Copy XML documentation". Alternatively, if you already have an overridden or implemented member in place, press Alt + Enter on the overridden

When I ran ReSharper on my code, for example: if (some condition) { Some code... } ReSharper gave me the above warning (Invert "if" statement to reduce nesting), and suggested the following correction: if (!some condition) return; Some code... I would like to understand why that's better. I always thought that using "return" in the middle of a method problematic, somewhat like "goto". jop A return in the middle of the method is not necessarily bad. It might be better to return immediately if it makes the intent of the code clearer. For example: double getPayAmount() { double result; if (