requirements

问题 We will probably be using Team Foundation Server (TFS). However, I see that it misses the agility of Confluence for managing requirements documentation, and I do not see SharePoint being close as good. My question is, is it possible to integrate TFS with Confluence, in the same way Confluence integrates to JIRA? Or is there some other viable alternative to managing requirements other than Confluence that would integrate with TFS? To my knowledge, TFS Work Items aren't really a good fit for

问题 Hi im insure about functional and non functional requirements, are these correct ? FUNCTIONAL: Player Creates account. Player Chooses Region. Player Chooses Player type. Player TypeA/Player Typeb Views Game statistics. Player TypeA Views opponent List. Player TypeA/Player Typeb Selects Target/Assassin From Job List. Player TypeA/Player Typeb Views opponent Map. Player TypeA views weapons. Player TypeA equips weapon . Player TypeA Shoots weapon; compute hit probability. Combat opponents player

问题 Seems that requirements on safety do not seem to like systems that use AI for safety-related requirements (particularly where large potential risks of destruction/death are involved). Can anyone suggest why ? I always thought that, provided you program your logic properly, the more intelligence you put in an algorithm, the more likely this algorithm is capable of preventing a dangerous situation. Are things different in practice? 回答1: Most AI algorithms are fuzzy -- typically learning as they

问题 Seems that requirements on safety do not seem to like systems that use AI for safety-related requirements (particularly where large potential risks of destruction/death are involved). Can anyone suggest why ? I always thought that, provided you program your logic properly, the more intelligence you put in an algorithm, the more likely this algorithm is capable of preventing a dangerous situation. Are things different in practice? 回答1: Most AI algorithms are fuzzy -- typically learning as they

问题 Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow. Closed 2 years ago . Enough detail is enough is the usual response. On the project we are currently busy with (which was incomplete and handed over to us without any brs/documentation/user stories of any sort, we get stories like: As a Product Owner I need the developer to test the XXX workflow so that it works correctly. and As a

问题 Now as I know ServiceStack uses .NET's Xml DataContractSerializer to serialize/deserialize XML, but with it we have some truble in case when our webservice API used not .NET framework. This problem very good described in this post if try short describe of problem: Requirement of strict sequence of nodes XML is very uncomfortable for some external no. NET system. Is it possible to use a different serialize or configure the ServiceStack used, so that he did not expect the elements in a rigidly

问题 After company wins a project it is usual to mention in contract what devices are supported and what OS versions are supported. But taking into account BlackBerry it appears sometimes to be tricky, as you can have the same device model, but two and(or) more different OS versions (or within same OS different package versions). And in this situation application may need to be updated. So the main question here is what is expected to be mentioned in contract? Could you please share some your

问题 I'm trying to find the best pragmatic approach to import functions on the fly... let me explain. Say I have a directory called functions which has these files: array_select.func.php stat_mediam.func.php stat_mean.func.php ..... I would like to: load each individual file (which has a function defined inside) and use it just like an internal php function.. such as array_pop(), array_shift(), etc. Once I stumbled on a tutorial (which I can't find again now) that compiled user defined functions

问题 Is there a formal language which can be used to capture the information present in an UML sequence diagram in to a text format, which is easy understandable by humans? In our place, often times software requirements are specified in terms of complex sequence diagrams which are difficult to review, verify for correctness and make changes. Also IMHO, programmers would prefer to implement from an unambiguous text representation of the requirements, rather than from sprawling multi page diagrams.

问题 I'm using on-premise TFS and plan to migrate to Visual Studio Team Services. But I still have one question - How to properly manage (store, edit, track) requirements (specifications) for software project in VSTS or TFS? What is the best solution? What do you use? Now we use OneNote.com and add links to OneNote pages to PBI in TFS. But it's not very convenient. 回答1: Requirements Management is a very broad subject, but when looking at the features of Team Services and TFS, then what you'll find