regex-lookarounds

RegEx - Exclude Matched Patterns

左心房为你撑大大i 提交于 2019-11-30 08:28:14
I have the below patterns to be excluded. make it cheaper make it cheapere makeitcheaper.com.au makeitcheaper making it cheaper www.make it cheaper ww.make it cheaper.com I've created a regex to match any of these. However, I want to get everything else other than these. I am not sure how to inverse this regex I've created. mak(e|ing) ?it ?cheaper Above pattern matches all the strings listed. Now I want it to match everything else. How do I do it? From the search, it seems I need something like negative lookahead / look back. But, I don't really get it. Can some one point me in the right

replace characters in notepad++ BUT exclude characters inside single quotation marks(2nd)

[亡魂溺海] 提交于 2019-11-29 16:50:51
replace characters in notepad++ BUT exclude characters inside single quotation marks Sorry to all users (especially to Avinash Raj) who answered already 1st similiar question - I did simply forget the 2nd kind of string. (And (that is the sad thing) - I'm not able to adjust the solution from 1st similiar question to the 2nd kind of string...) I have TWO different strings in this kind: SELECT column_name FROM table_name WHERE column_name IN ('A' , 'st9u' ,'Meyer', ....); WHERE a.object_type IN (' 'TABLE'', ''MATEerialIZED VIE3W' ') I want replace all characters in notepad++ from upper to lower,

Lookahead vs lookbehind

时光总嘲笑我的痴心妄想 提交于 2019-11-29 15:20:46
问题 I have a hard time to understand the concepts of "lookahead" and "lookbehind". For example, there is a string "aaaaaxbbbbb". If we look at "x", does lookahead mean looking "x" towards "bbbbb" or "aaaaa"? I mean the direction. 回答1: If the regex is x(?=insert_regex_here) that is a (positive) look*ahead*, which looks ahead , or forwards , in other words towards "bbbb". It means "find an x that is followed by insert_regex_here ". If the regex is (?<=insert_regex_here)x that is a (positive) look

Java support for conditional lookahead

旧城冷巷雨未停 提交于 2019-11-29 14:32:34
In the following let's say zip codes I am trying to exclude the 33333- from the result. I do: String zip = "11111 22222 33333- 44444-4444"; String regex = "\\d{5}(?(?=-)-\\d{4})"; Pattern pattern = Pattern.compile(regex); Matcher matcher = pattern.matcher(zip); while (matcher.find()) { System.out.println(" Found: " + matcher.group()); } Expect to get: Found: 11111 Found: 22222 Found: 44444-4444 I am trying to enforce format of: 5 digits optionally followed by a - and 4 digits. 5 digits with just a - (hyphen) is not wanted I get exception: Exception in thread "main" java.util.regex

functional difference between lookarounds and non-capture group?

北慕城南 提交于 2019-11-29 14:19:49
问题 I'm trying to come up with an example where positive look-around works but non-capture groups won't work, to further understand their usages. The examples I"m coming up with all work with non-capture groups as well, so I feel like I"m not fully grasping the usage of positive look around. Here is a string, (taken from a SO example) that uses positive look ahead in the answer. The user wanted to grab the second column value, only if the value of the first column started with ABC, and the last

Notepad++ use both regular expressions and extended search

风流意气都作罢 提交于 2019-11-29 12:41:35
I need to find all \r\n that do not precede the letter M; Seems I can't do this: \r\n[^M] I can only do \r\n with extended search selected or [^M] with regular expressions selected; but not together. You should instead use this regex: \R(?!M) Explanation: \R Any Unicode newline sequence. (?!M) Negative Lookahead : Assert "M" cannot be matched. \r\n is valid with Regular expression checked in the Find tab too - i.e. not just with Extended checked: why not just use \r\n[^M] with Regular expression checked? Given the following test text... whatever M whatever G foo ..., \r\n[^M] yields the

Regex matching multiple negative lookahead

给你一囗甜甜゛ 提交于 2019-11-29 11:54:58
问题 I'm trying to match a string (using a Perl regex) only if it doesn't start with "abc:" or "defg:", but I can't seem to find out how. I've tried something like ^(?:(?!abc:)|(?!defg:)) 回答1: Lookahead (?=foo) , (?!foo) and lookbehind (?<=foo) , (?<!foo) do not consume any characters. You can: ^(?!abc:)(?!defg:) or ^(?!defg:)(?!abc:) The order does not make a difference. 回答2: Try doing this : ^(?!(?:abc|defg):) 回答3: … or could have dropped the alternation from the original expression: ^(?:(?!abc:

RegEx - Exclude Matched Patterns

白昼怎懂夜的黑 提交于 2019-11-29 11:42:34
问题 I have the below patterns to be excluded. make it cheaper make it cheapere makeitcheaper.com.au makeitcheaper making it cheaper www.make it cheaper ww.make it cheaper.com I've created a regex to match any of these. However, I want to get everything else other than these. I am not sure how to inverse this regex I've created. mak(e|ing) ?it ?cheaper Above pattern matches all the strings listed. Now I want it to match everything else. How do I do it? From the search, it seems I need something

Java regex: Negative lookahead

时光毁灭记忆、已成空白 提交于 2019-11-29 09:03:12
I'm trying to craft two regular expressions that will match URIs. These URIs are of the format: /foo/someVariableData and /foo/someVariableData/bar/someOtherVariableData I need two regexes. Each needs to match one but not the other. The regexes I originally came up with are: /foo/.+ and /foo/.+/bar/.+ respectively. I think the second regex is fine. It will only match the second string. The first regex, however, matches both. So, I started playing around (for the first time) with negative lookahead. I designed the regex /foo/.+(?!bar) and set up the following code to test it public static void

Why does this backreference not work inside a lookbehind?

假如想象 提交于 2019-11-29 01:23:08
Matching a repeated character in regex is simple with a backreference: (.)\1 Test it here. However, I would like to match the character after the pair of characters, so I thought I could simply put this in a lookbehind: (?<=(.)\1). Unfortunately, this doesn't match anything. Why is that? In other flavours I wouldn't be surprised because there are strong restrictions on lookbehinds, but .NET usually supports arbitrarily complicated patterns inside lookbehinds. Martin Ender The short version: Lookbehinds are matched from right to left. That means when the regex engine encounters the \1 it hasn't