protege

I have created the ontology file in the Protege and save it in the RDF/XML format. It also contains the OWL tag. So, the ontology file created by Protege and saved as RDF/XML format are actually the RDF files or the RDF form of the OWL files or the OWL format containing the RDF also or something else ? <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE rdf:RDF [ <!ENTITY owl "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" > <!ENTITY xsd "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <!ENTITY rdfs "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" > <!ENTITY rdf "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" > ]> <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://www

I'm trying to load an ontology in Protégé but it is not processed as expected. Most problematic is that all the Object and Data Properties appear as Annotation instead of Data Property and Object Property. I have an Object Property kingdom : <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="&wo;kingdom"> <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">kingdom</rdfs:label> <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">associates a taxon rank with a kingdom</rdfs:comment> <vs:term_status>testing</vs:term_status> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&wo;Kingdom"/> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="&wo;TaxonRank"/> </owl:ObjectProperty> /nature/life/Chordate#kingdom has

I have been stuck for two days now trying to understand why the following scenario isn't working: screenshots here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4677548/screenshots.html I have a VegetarianFood class (subclass of Food) that is equivalent to "Food and (Eggs or MilkAndDerivates or VeganFood)" as you can see in the screenshot number 1 The VeganFood class, on turn, is equivalent to other classes (NutsAndSeeds, Cereals, Fruit, etc...) screenshot 2 as you can see there are two individuals (cheddar cheese and cashew) created as MilkAndDerivates and NutsAndSeeds screenshot 3 and they are correctly inferred

I have been looking at and playing with OWL through Protege and I would like to know if I understand the "workflow" and idea of it correctly (for building up a database from scratch: Generate an OWL ontology for your data using Protege or equivalent Export this schema to RDF Use the classes defined as some of the elements in a triplestore along with your target data Export your triplestore to RDF Use openRDF/sesame or Jena to load the defined data and ontology Validate your RDF triplestore against your OWL ontology to make sure everything is ok Use SPARQL to get data from your RDF triplestore

The general problem I'm working on a simple ontology, using Protégé 4.3 and trying to create a model such that every instance of a class C has some particular value v , which is an instance of a class V , for a given property p . I can get this inference using an axiom C subClassOf (p value v) but I think I want to be able to state this more along the lines of a C subClassOf (p some V) because I'd actually like each instance of C to be related to every instance of V . A specific example My example is automobiles and actions — I want to create a set of actions for automobiles. When I create new

可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 由 翻译 强力驱动 问题: The protege SWRL tab is not available in Protege 4 versions, I have tried both protege 4.1 and protege 4.2. The axiome plugin mentioned to edit the SWRL rules in protege has been said to work only in protege 3 versions. Can anyone tell me plugins or procedure to include the plugin to edit SWRL rules in protege? 回答1: SWRL rules can be edited in Protégé 4, but not with a nice interface like in Protégé 3. If you go to menu Window -> Views -> Ontology views, there is an option Rules. Select it and add it as a "view", i.e., a rectangle

The protege SWRL tab is not available in Protege 4 versions, I have tried both protege 4.1 and protege 4.2. The axiome plugin mentioned to edit the SWRL rules in protege has been said to work only in protege 3 versions. Can anyone tell me plugins or procedure to include the plugin to edit SWRL rules in protege? SWRL rules can be edited in Protégé 4, but not with a nice interface like in Protégé 3. If you go to menu Window -> Views -> Ontology views, there is an option Rules. Select it and add it as a "view", i.e., a rectangle in the current tab. Rules are written like this: parent(?x,?y),