production-environment

In-App purchase testing on production environment without spending money

纵饮孤独 提交于 2019-12-04 04:02:25
问题 I have an iOS app which I am about to release on the App store. I want to test In-App purchases in production environment. How I can test In-App purchases for production app which has not been released yet? 回答1: Go to itunesConnect , Users and Roles, Create a sandbox user . I am thinking you have already made the in app purchase items in your app in itunes connect. Now in your device log out the Appstore ID from settings. Do the in app purchase using the Test user credentials you created, and

Can't start unicorn, master failed to start, check stderr log for details

不问归期 提交于 2019-12-04 01:11:59
I dont know what’s wrong with the unicorn.rb file. my unicorn.rb config is APP_PATH = "/var/www/demo" working_directory APP_PATH stderr_path APP_PATH + "/log/unicorn.stderr.log" stdout_path APP_PATH + "/log/unicorn.stderr.log" pid APP_PATH + "/tmp/pid/unicorn.pid" running nginx successful. sudo servier nginx start sudo unicorn -c /var/www/demo/config/unicorn.rb -D The socket is the "file" that nginx and unicorn use as a channel for all communication between them. Where have you defined it? In our unicorn configs, we usually have a line like this: listen APP_PATH + "/tmp/pid/.unicorn.sock Then,

Why is XAMPP not suited for production? [closed]

a 夏天 提交于 2019-12-04 00:49:41
I have been running XAMPP on Windows 2008 R2 for many years now, I'm only using Apache, MySql and FileZilla. I have made many custom adjustments and upgraded it serveral times. I have addressed all the security issues I have been able to find. Running as services, the servers are never down as long as Windows Server is up. They are incredible stable. Why on earth do people tell me I should not do this? None of the Q or A's I have seen here deals with the specifics, most of them ends up in typically "it's not recommended", "it's says so on the XAMPP web site, therefore it's bad". I understand

Best practice for test and production environments

烂漫一生 提交于 2019-12-04 00:24:34
问题 In the company I work, we have 2 environments: test and production. We are not currently starting a new environment, because of cost. Here is the procedure we follow: business makes a feature request, development makes it happen and deploy on test environment. Then business tests it (UAT), and if it's OK, the feature will be included into next production deployment. The problem reveals on test DB. Developers treat test environment as their playground, and sometimes they rest the DB to initial

Deploying a production Node.js server [closed]

£可爱£侵袭症+ 提交于 2019-12-03 18:18:29
问题 Closed . This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers. Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post. Closed 2 years ago . I've written a Node.js app, I'm looking to get it running on one of our production machines. This seems like a pretty common request yet I can't find an adequate solution. Is there not established solutions for deploying production Node.js apps? The app is simple (<100 LOC),

GAE/J : Development and Production Environment

。_饼干妹妹 提交于 2019-12-03 17:29:57
What are GAE/J key differences between development and production environments. What should be rechecked at production? What kind of datastore differences should I expect? Development environment is single threaded No request timeout No exploding index , infact dev env does not use indexes at all for queries No async URLFetch No async Datastore Obviously no request statistics / log searching interface No wait time for index building No datastore timeouts No reduced capabilities Performance on dev (understandably) has absolutely no relation to production. Cold-starts are not an issue in

Is NHibernate SchemaUpdate safe in production code?

陌路散爱 提交于 2019-12-03 17:13:19
问题 For simplicity's sake. I'm using Fluent NHibernate's Automapping combined with NHibernate's SchemaUpdate during runtime. On each run Automapper creates mappings for all entity classes and SchemaUpdate applies the schema to the existing database. I was pleasantly surprised that it works correctly against an empty database as well. It's worked fine so far in a development environment and has allowed me to respond to bugs rather quickly. My question is whether it is reliable enough to leave in

Unicorn/Nginx process missing, socket open

我只是一个虾纸丫 提交于 2019-12-03 15:53:25
I am trying to deploy code using Capistrano, and it fails on deploy:start or deploy:stop because the Unicorn process is already killed. However if I try to cap deploy:start , I get a stderr claiming that Address already in use - /tmp/my_app.socket . How would this happen, and how might I get out of this mess? Still not sure how this happens, but the following solution seems to work: lsof /tmp/my_app.socket - lists the pids kill -9 pid - (replace 'pid' with one of those listed) Then cap deploy:start from the local terminal. 来源: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10150245/unicorn-nginx-process

Using CoffeeScript in a production environment [closed]

限于喜欢 提交于 2019-12-03 14:38:24
问题 As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance. Closed 7 years ago . I really like using CoffeeScript (1.1.1) for small projects and it worked out great so far. However before using it in a more broad

Tasks for production prepared Ionic app

时光总嘲笑我的痴心妄想 提交于 2019-12-03 14:13:45
I'm trying to figure out what's the best process to pass from the code to the final deployable apk/ipa. So far I have a testsuite using Karma + Jasmine, which transpiles the TypeScript to JS and runs some unit tests. I start that process via gulp. After that all I know is to ionic build android --release what generates (an unsigned yet) apk. But I'm not sure of how ofuscated/minificated the generated apk is. So, keeping in mind the code has to be as private as possible, is the minification and the ofuscation of the ionic build enough or should I do all those prebuild tasks manually via gulp?