private

I'm making an authenticated call to access photos through Flickr API. But I am only getting my public photos but not any private photos. Given below is the code I'm using, Flickr f; RequestContext requestContext; String frob = ""; String token = ""; DocumentBuilder xmlParser = null; public void getImages() throws ParserConfigurationException, IOException, SAXException, FlickrException, URISyntaxException, NoSuchAlgorithmException { DocumentBuilderFactory dcb = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance(); try { this.xmlParser = dcb.newDocumentBuilder(); } catch (ParserConfigurationException ex) { ex

Let's assume that we can change in runtime Localizable.strings, that is placed in NSBundle At the current moment, even if we change it's contents, NSLocalizedString would return old(cached) values. Run Application Get LocalizableString for specific key1 <- value1 Change Localizable.strings key1 = value2 <-- Do something in application to invalidate Localization cache --> Check if LocalizableString for specific key1 == value2 What I've already tried: [[NSBundble mainBundle] invalidateResourceCache] [UIApplication _performMemoryWarning] Tried to see, if there's some dictionaries. used for

This question already has an answer here: Pros and cons of package private classes in Java? 8 answers I love access control in any language, but I find that in Java I almost never (if ever) use the package-private access modifier (or lack thereof). I realize that inner classes can be private , protected , or package-private , but outer classes can only be package-private or public . Why can an outer class be package-private but not protected ? What is the benefit of restricting classes/methods/fields to be seen by the entire package, but not subclasses? I use package-private classes and

Very recently I came across the Reflection API and to my surprise we can access and even alter the private variables.I tried the following code import java.lang.reflect.Field; public class SomeClass{ private String name = "John"; } public class Test{ public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception { SomeClass myClass = new SomeClass(); Field fs = myClass.getClass().getDeclaredField("name"); fs.setAccessible(true); System.out.println("Variable is " + fs.getName() + " and value is " + fs.get(myClass)); fs.set(myClass, "Sam"); System.out.println("Variable is " + fs.getName() + " and value

Given this sample code: #include <iostream> #include <stdexcept> class my_exception_t : std::exception { public: explicit my_exception_t() { } virtual const char* what() const throw() { return "Hello, world!"; } }; int main() { try { throw my_exception_t(); } catch (const std::exception& error) { std::cerr << "Exception: " << error.what() << std::endl; } catch (...) { std::cerr << "Exception: unknown" << std::endl; } return 0; } I get the following output: Exception: unknown Yet simply making the inheritance of my_exception_t from std::exception public , I get the following output: Exception: