precision-recall

FastText recall is 'nan' but precision is a number

旧时模样 提交于 2021-02-10 05:31:20
问题 I trained a supervised model in FastText using the Python interface and I'm getting weird results for precision and recall. First, I trained a model: model = fasttext.train_supervised("train.txt", wordNgrams=3, epoch=100, pretrainedVectors=pretrained_model) Then I get results for the test data: def print_results(N, p, r): print("N\t" + str(N)) print("P@{}\t{:.3f}".format(1, p)) print("R@{}\t{:.3f}".format(1, r)) print_results(*model.test('test.txt')) But the results are always odd, because

Difference between AUPRC in caret and PRROC

自作多情 提交于 2021-02-09 08:37:23
问题 I'm working in a very unbalanced classification problem, and I'm using AUPRC as metric in caret. I'm getting very differents results for the test set in AUPRC from caret and in AUPRC from package PRROC. In order to make it easy, the reproducible example uses PimaIndiansDiabetes dataset from package mlbench: rm(list=ls()) library(caret) library(mlbench) library(PRROC) #load data, renaming it to 'datos' data(PimaIndiansDiabetes) datos=PimaIndiansDiabetes[,1:9] # training and test set.seed(998)

Difference between AUPRC in caret and PRROC

大憨熊 提交于 2021-02-09 08:34:51
问题 I'm working in a very unbalanced classification problem, and I'm using AUPRC as metric in caret. I'm getting very differents results for the test set in AUPRC from caret and in AUPRC from package PRROC. In order to make it easy, the reproducible example uses PimaIndiansDiabetes dataset from package mlbench: rm(list=ls()) library(caret) library(mlbench) library(PRROC) #load data, renaming it to 'datos' data(PimaIndiansDiabetes) datos=PimaIndiansDiabetes[,1:9] # training and test set.seed(998)

Difference between AUPRC in caret and PRROC

南笙酒味 提交于 2021-02-09 08:33:26
问题 I'm working in a very unbalanced classification problem, and I'm using AUPRC as metric in caret. I'm getting very differents results for the test set in AUPRC from caret and in AUPRC from package PRROC. In order to make it easy, the reproducible example uses PimaIndiansDiabetes dataset from package mlbench: rm(list=ls()) library(caret) library(mlbench) library(PRROC) #load data, renaming it to 'datos' data(PimaIndiansDiabetes) datos=PimaIndiansDiabetes[,1:9] # training and test set.seed(998)

Difference between AUPRC in caret and PRROC

蓝咒 提交于 2021-02-09 08:32:47
问题 I'm working in a very unbalanced classification problem, and I'm using AUPRC as metric in caret. I'm getting very differents results for the test set in AUPRC from caret and in AUPRC from package PRROC. In order to make it easy, the reproducible example uses PimaIndiansDiabetes dataset from package mlbench: rm(list=ls()) library(caret) library(mlbench) library(PRROC) #load data, renaming it to 'datos' data(PimaIndiansDiabetes) datos=PimaIndiansDiabetes[,1:9] # training and test set.seed(998)

How To Calculate F1-Score For Multilabel Classification?

我怕爱的太早我们不能终老 提交于 2021-02-07 03:16:02
问题 I try to calculate the f1_score but I get some warnings for some cases when I use the sklearn f1_score method. I have a multilabel 5 classes problem for a prediction. import numpy as np from sklearn.metrics import f1_score y_true = np.zeros((1,5)) y_true[0,0] = 1 # => label = [[1, 0, 0, 0, 0]] y_pred = np.zeros((1,5)) y_pred[:] = 1 # => prediction = [[1, 1, 1, 1, 1]] result_1 = f1_score(y_true=y_true, y_pred=y_pred, labels=None, average="weighted") print(result_1) # prints 1.0 result_2 = f1

How To Calculate F1-Score For Multilabel Classification?

寵の児 提交于 2021-02-07 03:15:34
问题 I try to calculate the f1_score but I get some warnings for some cases when I use the sklearn f1_score method. I have a multilabel 5 classes problem for a prediction. import numpy as np from sklearn.metrics import f1_score y_true = np.zeros((1,5)) y_true[0,0] = 1 # => label = [[1, 0, 0, 0, 0]] y_pred = np.zeros((1,5)) y_pred[:] = 1 # => prediction = [[1, 1, 1, 1, 1]] result_1 = f1_score(y_true=y_true, y_pred=y_pred, labels=None, average="weighted") print(result_1) # prints 1.0 result_2 = f1

sklearn precision_recall_curve and threshold

走远了吗. 提交于 2021-01-29 17:28:59
问题 I was wondering how sklearn decides how many thresholds to use in precision_recall_curve. There is another post on this here: How does sklearn select threshold steps in precision recall curve?. It mentions the source code where I found this example import numpy as np from sklearn.metrics import precision_recall_curve y_true = np.array([0, 0, 1, 1]) y_scores = np.array([0.1, 0.4, 0.35, 0.8]) precision, recall, thresholds = precision_recall_curve(y_true, y_scores) which then gives >>>precision