powermock

I have a static method that is mocked using PowerMock to throw an exception. (It deletes files.) Unfortunately, during my @After (after-each-test) method, I need to call this method without the mocks. How can I umock a method? I don't see an equivalent to Mockito.reset() . [ Ref: mockito : how to unmock a method? ] Example: @RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class) @PrepareForTest(PathUtils.class) // Important: This class has a static method we want to mock. public class CleaningServiceImplTest2 extends TestBase { public static final File testDirPath = new File(CleaningServiceImplTest2.class

I need a method which returns something to do nothing when invoked during testing, the class instance which owns the method is implemented as a spy. I am aware the doNothing() method only works with void methods. Is there a way to get the same behaviour with a method that returns something? Thank you! Use when(spy.myMethod()).thenReturn(null) . This will prevent the spy from invoking the wrapped instance. You have to tell Mockito what to return for a method that returns something. The default behavior for a mock is to return null . The default behavior for a spy is to call the wrapped object.

I am trying to mock a final class PowerMockito.mockStatic(TestFinalClass.class); It is working from my eclipse when I run a single junit and add javaagent to my VM arguments -javaagent:{path}/powermock-module-javaagent-1.6.4.jar But when I try to run all test cases from command line using maven build command I am still getting "Cannot subclass final class" Below is my snippet from pom.xml <plugin> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> <artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId> <version>2.4</version> <configuration> <argLine>-javaagent:{path}/powermock-module-javaagent-1.6.4.jar<

Dear stackoverflow comrades, I again have a problem in getting a specific PowerMock / Mockito case to work. The issue is, that I need to verify the call of a private static method, which is called from a public non-static method . A similar example I posted previously on How to suppress and verify private static method calls? This is my code: class Factory { public String factorObject() throws Exception { String s = "Hello Mary Lou"; checkString(s); return s; } private static void checkString(String s) throws Exception { throw new Exception(); } } And this is my testclass: @RunWith

I'm stuck in a very weird case. I have some specific code which I need to test. Here it is: public class A { /* * The real method of real class is so big that I just don't want to test it. * That's why I use throwing an exception. */ protected void method(Integer result) { throw new RuntimeException("Oops!"); } protected <T> T generifiedMethod(String s, T type) { throw new RuntimeException("Oops!"); } protected void mainMethod(Integer value) { throw new RuntimeException("Oops!"); } } I also have a child class: public class B extends A { @Override protected void mainMethod(Integer value) { if

I am trying to mock an inner method call of my test method My class looks like this public class App { public Student getStudent() { MyDAO dao = new MyDAO(); return dao.getStudentDetails();//getStudentDetails is a public //non-static method in the DAO class } When I write the junit for the method getStudent(), is there a way in PowerMock to mock the line dao.getStudentDetails(); or make the App class use a mock dao object during junit execution instead of the actual dao call which connects to the DB? You can use the whenNew() method from PowerMock (see https://github.com/powermock/powermock

I have a class like this: public final class Foo { public native int getBar(); public String toString() { return "Bar: " + getBar(); } } Please note that getBar() is implemented with JNI and that the class is final . I want to write a junit test to test the toString() method. For this I need to mock the getBar() method and then run the original toString() method to check the output. My first thought was that this must be impossible but then I found PowerMock which supports testing final classes and native methods according to the feature list. But so far I had no success with it. The best