ports

Checking for WebRTC connectivity - reliable methods

夙愿已清 提交于 2021-02-18 18:15:14
问题 I have a live video chat application and I use a TURN server which supports STUN/TURN and both UPD/TCP transmission. Sometimes users can be connected to the network which blocks that much ports and protocols that WebRTC connection just cannot happen (usually those are corporate networks). I would like to check if a WebRTC connection is possible before users try to connect to each other (actually, perform a technical check ). How can I do it? Ideas I have in my head: Try to download a hosted

Azure service bus access using Java SDK, Connectivity Mode

寵の児 提交于 2021-02-10 05:39:15
问题 There are several examples of configuring the service bus environment to use http/https with C#, using the call: ServiceBusEnvironment.SystemConnectivity.Mode = ConnectivityMode.Http; My question is - can and how do I do this via a java client? 回答1: The newer versions of the SDK (1.0 and later) do not support HTTP connectivity (AMQP only), and the older ones do not support AMQP (HTTP only). As a result there's no "need" for connectivity mode settings. The Java SDK is AMQP only. If http is

TCP - possible for same client-side port to be used for different connections by different applications simlutaneously?

一世执手 提交于 2021-02-08 09:25:29
问题 Is it possible in TCP for different processes not sharing the same executable image (so no fork() for example) to use a same client-side port on Windows, Linux or OSX? This is specifically related to the socket options SO_REUSEADDR and SO_REUSEPORT set using setsockopt() I believe. As far as I've read, I believe it is possible for the same process/image to do this, but I haven't found information as to multiple processes/images. I would imagine it is theoretically possible since each socket

Opening a port on Ubuntu

元气小坏坏 提交于 2021-02-07 10:21:02
问题 I am trying to open up port on my Ubuntu machine to allow me to connect the Mongo using an external program. I ran this which is the command line to open a new port: sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 27017 -j ACCEPT but when I ran this to check if the new rule was there... sudo netstat -ntlp | grep LISTEN ...the new port wasn't in the list - any ideas? 回答1: I think the mangodb instance was not started, apart from that , sudo netstat -ntlp | grep LISTEN gives the list ports that are active

Opening a port on Ubuntu

跟風遠走 提交于 2021-02-07 10:19:56
问题 I am trying to open up port on my Ubuntu machine to allow me to connect the Mongo using an external program. I ran this which is the command line to open a new port: sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 27017 -j ACCEPT but when I ran this to check if the new rule was there... sudo netstat -ntlp | grep LISTEN ...the new port wasn't in the list - any ideas? 回答1: I think the mangodb instance was not started, apart from that , sudo netstat -ntlp | grep LISTEN gives the list ports that are active

lsof print numeric ports

|▌冷眼眸甩不掉的悲伤 提交于 2020-05-09 20:01:08
问题 How do you get lsof to produce numeric port information instead of attempting to resolve the port to service name? For example, I want TCP *:http (LISTEN) to give me TCP *:80 (LISTEN) in-fact if at all possible I never want to see another service name in lsof print-out ever again. So if there is a way to make numeric ports the default I would like to understand how to do that as well. 回答1: Run lsof -P . According to man lsof, -P inhibits the conversion of port numbers to port names for

Why is the maximum port range 65535 in the TCP/IP Suite?

这一生的挚爱 提交于 2020-03-21 19:10:34
问题 My doubt is that - a port is just logical, so why such restriction ? Why can't I have a port of 9924593 or something like that ? 回答1: Look at the packet format for the TCP segment. The port identifiers are unsigned 16-bit integers, meaning that the largest number you can put in there is 2 16 -1 = 65535. 来源: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36796183/why-is-the-maximum-port-range-65535-in-the-tcp-ip-suite

Why is the maximum port range 65535 in the TCP/IP Suite?

£可爱£侵袭症+ 提交于 2020-03-21 19:06:01
问题 My doubt is that - a port is just logical, so why such restriction ? Why can't I have a port of 9924593 or something like that ? 回答1: Look at the packet format for the TCP segment. The port identifiers are unsigned 16-bit integers, meaning that the largest number you can put in there is 2 16 -1 = 65535. 来源: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36796183/why-is-the-maximum-port-range-65535-in-the-tcp-ip-suite

Why is the maximum port range 65535 in the TCP/IP Suite?

时光总嘲笑我的痴心妄想 提交于 2020-03-21 19:05:45
问题 My doubt is that - a port is just logical, so why such restriction ? Why can't I have a port of 9924593 or something like that ? 回答1: Look at the packet format for the TCP segment. The port identifiers are unsigned 16-bit integers, meaning that the largest number you can put in there is 2 16 -1 = 65535. 来源: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36796183/why-is-the-maximum-port-range-65535-in-the-tcp-ip-suite