portforwarding

I am attempting to make a LAMP box using Vagrant. I have been told that it is quite simple to use. I am completely new to networks and virtual machines and have very little experience with Linux/Ubuntu. I have currently tried following the tutorial on the official documentation page: http://docs.vagrantup.com/v2/getting-started/networking.html . I have gotten up to the networking article in the documentation and can't seem to get it working. Now the problem is, due to my inexperience with networking and linux based OS's I have no idea where to begin trouble shooting. I will try to give as much

I have Docker engine installed on Debian Jessie and I am running there container with nginx in it. My "run" command looks like this: docker run -p 1234:80 -d -v /var/www/:/usr/share/nginx/html nginx:1.9 It works fine, problem is that now content of this container is accessible via http://{server_ip}:1234 . I want to run multiple containers (domains) on this server so I want to setup reverse proxies for them. How can I make sure that container will be only accessible via reverse proxy and not directly from IP:port ? Eg.: http://{server_ip}:1234 # not found, connection refused, etc... http:/

I am currently testing if my developing environment will run on the new upcoming Mac OS 10.11 and if I can upgrade as soon as it's released. On my test machine I am currently running the Beta Preview 3. Everything seems to be running fine. I just can get pfctl to forward my ports. I use Vagrant and Parallels Desktop to run a Debian system for my local web server. Vagrant forwards port 8080 on the host to 80 on the guest. So 127.0.0.1:8080 works fine. But in some projects I want to have the exact same domain local as it will be in production. (without the :8080) Also I just like it more. ;-) To

I'm extremely excited about html5's websockets spec but I have a concern. These days everyone is operating off of some network, with routers (wired/wireless) that have built in firewalls, windows has a built in firewall too. With that in mind when the server attempts to connect back to the browser that started the websocket handshake will it fail for the vast majority of users? (most people have no idea how to set up port forwarding on their routers) Or is my thinking incorrect and it will go through fine? Mark Renouf I'm not an expert (so please check to confirm) but I believe there will be

How do I redirect an incomming request on port xxx to localhost:yyy on windows 7? Development Server (vs 2008) only allow access from localhost which isnt good enough. I need to test my app from various computers. Thanks for the suggestions guys, although I found the answer myself. I downloaded Microsoft SOAP Toolkit version 3 and started MSSoapT, created a formatted trace listening on port 8080, forwarding to host: 127.0.0.1 port: 3804. My problem was I used "localhost" and not "127.0.0.1". Now every request made to my development machine from other computers through port 8080 will be

I've built a vagrant/virtualbox web server as a development sandbox, and configured apache in the VM for ssl (on the default port 443, with a self-signed certificate). I've tested pages on the VM itself using curl curl -v -k https://mysite.mydomain.com/testSearch/results?postcode=WN8+0BA and it seems to work quite happily, so I'm satisfied that apache is correctly configured and working in the VM. However, when I try to access the VM from my host's browsers over https, I'm unable to do so. I've added config.vm.forward_port "https", 443, 8443 to my vagrantfile, but trying to access the url