plpgsql

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35559093/how-to-use-variable-as-table-name-in-plpgsql

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64409013/how-to-execute-anonymous-block-pl-pgsql-postgresql-13-from-npgsql-4-1-5-0-in-c

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64409013/how-to-execute-anonymous-block-pl-pgsql-postgresql-13-from-npgsql-4-1-5-0-in-c

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64081572/splitting-comma-separated-string-in-pl-pgsql-function

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37715349/use-set-variable-inside-plpgsql-declare-block

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23300003/create-alias-for-postgresql-table

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47588595/postgres-constraint-with-check-on-insert-only

问题 I come from a SQL Server background where the '@' symbol is used/encouraged in stored procedures. This is useful because you can easily see what is a column and what is a value. For example. CREATE PROCEDURE Foo @Bar VARCHAR(10), @Baz INT AS BEGIN INSERT INTO MyTable ( Bar, Baz) VALUES ( @Bar, @Baz) END I know that I can just use ordinal position but some of our stored procs have 20 or so parameters and the named parameter makes it much more legible IMO. Is there some sort of convention that

问题 I am trying to create a PostgreSQL function where I will loop over the rows of a query and store some of them in an array, before doing more stuff with it. How can I create an array of rowtype? CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION forExample() RETURNS integer AS $BODY$ DECLARE r "WEBHOST"%rowtype; b "WEBHOST"%rowtype[]; <- This does not work !!! BEGIN FOR r IN SELECT * FROM "WEBHOST" LOOP array_append(b, r); END LOOP; RETURN 33; END $BODY$ LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'; The above function will be more complex,

问题 I'm having an issue with resolving issue with <forcedType> for stored function written in PL/pgSQL in my generated Routines. This question is more specific for solving problem I had already asked in this question and answer is partially provided in this Q&A. This is ONE of my user-defined functions in PL/pgSQL which I'm having issue with (I'm displaying only one since both functions have same RETURN TYPE and INPUT parameter ): create or replace function public.get_order_by_order_id(o_id