page-load-time

Consider a similar css code: @font-face { font-family: 'MyFont'; src: url('../fonts/MyFont.eot'); src: local('Proxima'), url('../fonts/MyFont.woff') format('woff'), url('../fonts/MyFont.ttf') format('truetype'), url('../fonts/MyFont.svg') format('svg'); font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; } Does this code determine more HTTP requests to download all the formats or does the browser choose the best supported format? Nope, browser will choose one compatible format. Feel free to add as many sources as you like :) No, only one will be used. You can test it for example with firebug or google

On a website I manage we have several .woff files, one for each font. In the interest to save loading time I want to reduce the number of requests made. Is it possible to combine these woff files into one resource? You can bundle the woff assets into your CSS with base64. Inside your @font-face declaration: url('data:application/x-font-woff;base64,myVeryLongBase64StringGoesHere...'); This may increase the asset's file size. In my experience this is usually by around 20% - roughly the same size as the equivalent TTF file. Much of this may be recovered with a gzip-capable server. The tradeoff is

Can anyone guide me what C# code should I write for getting page load time of each URL if the URLs are given as an input ? OR if possible please provide me link to any software that does that. Any software that takes several URL as input and provides the page load time for each URL. Do you want to measure the time it takes for the first request to be answered, or do you want to include the downloading of style and external scripts and clientside rendering? The first can simply be solved by using a WebClient . WebClient client = new WebClient (); // Add a user agent header in case the //

Is there a way to check how long does it take for the page to load? EDIT: I will extend the question a bit. Say you are working on a ASP.NET project and when you run your project within the Visual Studio there is some loading time before you can see your starting page rendered on the screen and ready to use. If this website was live the load time should be different from the load time when starting your project from Visual Studio. What I would like to see is what would be the actual load time if the web site was on a server. EDIT 2: Answer Chrome -> Right Click -> Inspect Element -> Network

We're using OpenX to serve ads on a number of sites. If the OpenX server has problems, however, it blocks page loads on these sites. I'd rather have the sites fail gracefully, i.e. load the pages without the ads and fill them in when they become available. We're using OpenX's single page call , and we're giving divs explicit size in CSS so they can be laid out without their contents, but still loading the script blocks page load. Are there other best practices for speeding up pages with OpenX? OpenX has some documentation on how to make their tags load asynchronously: http://docs.openx.com/ad

Do any solutions currently exist that can minify an entire project directory? More importantly, do any solutions exist that can shorten classnames, id's, and keep them consistent throughout all documents? Something that can turn this: Index.html --- <div class="fooBar"> <!-- Code --> </div> Styles.css --- .fooBar { // Comments and Messages background-color: #000000; } Index.js --- $(".fooBar").click( function () { /* More Comments */ alert( "fooBar" ); }); Into This: Index.html --- <div class="a"></div> Styles.css --- .a{background-color:#000;} Index.js --- $(".a").click(function(){alert(

I have a lot of ckeditors on one web page for students to enter their data. I have a lot of ckeditors because each one is for one variable. Unfortunately, an input text field is too small for the data requested. The problem is that it takes too long for the web page to load and sometimes the web page hangs. I'm currently loading almost 425 editors. Here's an example of my code for three: <script type='text/javascript'>//<![CDATA[ $(window).load(function () { CKEDITOR.on('instanceReady', function (ev) { var jqScript = document.createElement('script'); var bsScript = document.createElement(

In the following image, I want the total response time from the webpage. I can't seem to find it in the file sample HAR file , i.e. 38.79s in this case. Does anyone know how to get this? I am going to use Selenium along with Firebug and NetExport to export the HAR file, but right now I am trying to do it manually. Adding the individual responses does not give correct numbers. At some point I would like a Java program to find and extract the total response time. The total load time is not calculated by summarizing all request times but by the latest request end time. Graphically spoken it is

I made a few tests with lab js in one of the sites I've developed and got a reduction of 200ms in the page load time. The total time spent now after backend processing is around 1.5 seconds. I was wandering if its worth the trouble. Is 200ms a huge gain? A ridiculous one? I know that page load times affect page ranking, but 200ms will make such a big difference? Quoting Milliseconds are Money: How Much Performance Matters in the Cloud : 5) The Proof That Milliseconds Matter … The big guys in the cloud industry have really dug deep and proved that those milliseconds matter: For every 100ms