openmp

openmp parallel for loop with two or more reductions

你。 提交于 2019-12-03 06:08:11
Hi just wondering if this is the right way to go going about having a regular for loop but with two reductions , is this the right approach below? Would this work with more then two reductions as well. Is there a better way to do this? also is there any chance to integrate this with an MPI_ALLREDUCE command? heres the psuedo code #pragma omp parallel for \ default(shared) private(i) \ //todo first reduction(+:sum) //todo second reduction(+:result) for loop i < n; i ++; { y = fun(x,z,i) sum += fun2(y,x) result += fun3(y,z) } You can do reduction by specifying more than one variable separated by

OpenMP and NUMA relation?

百般思念 提交于 2019-12-03 05:19:20
问题 I have a dual socket Xeon E5522 2.26GHZ machine (with hyperthreading disabled) running ubuntu server on linux kernel 3.0 supporting NUMA. The architecture layout is 4 physical cores per socket. An OpenMP application runs in this machine and i have the following questions: Does an OpenMP program take advantage (i.e a thread and its private data are kept on a numa node along the execution) automatically when running on a NUMA machine + aware kernel?. If not, what can be done? what about NUMA

Set number of threads using omp_set_num_threads() to 2, but omp_get_num_threads() returns 1

江枫思渺然 提交于 2019-12-03 04:43:38
I have the following C/C++ code using OpenMP: int nProcessors=omp_get_max_threads(); if(argv[4]!=NULL){ printf("argv[4]: %s\n",argv[4]); nProcessors=atoi(argv[4]); printf("nProcessors: %d\n",nProcessors); } omp_set_num_threads(nProcessors); printf("omp_get_num_threads(): %d\n",omp_get_num_threads()); exit(0); As you can see, I'm trying to set the number of processors to use based on an argument passed on the command line. However, I'm getting the following output: argv[4]: 2 //OK nProcessors: 2 //OK omp_get_num_threads(): 1 //WTF?! Why isn't omp_get_num_threads() returning 2?!!! As has been

Is armadillo solve() thread safe?

懵懂的女人 提交于 2019-12-03 04:08:06
In my code I have loop in which I construct and over determined linear system and try to solve it: #pragma omp parallel for for (int i = 0; i < n[0]+1; i++) { for (int j = 0; j < n[1]+1; j++) { for (int k = 0; k < n[2]+1; k++) { arma::mat A(max_points, 2); arma::mat y(max_points, 1); // initialize A and y arma::vec solution = solve(A,y); } } } Sometimes, quite randomly the program hangs or the results in the solution vector are NaN. And if I put do this: arma::vec solution; #pragma omp critical { solution = solve(weights*A,weights*y); } then these problem don't seem to happen anymore. When it

OpenMP Dynamic vs Guided Scheduling

喜夏-厌秋 提交于 2019-12-03 03:47:07
问题 I'm studying OpenMP's scheduling and specifically the different types. I understand the general behavior of each type, but clarification would be helpful regarding when to choose between dynamic and guided scheduling. Intel's docs describe dynamic scheduling: Use the internal work queue to give a chunk-sized block of loop iterations to each thread. When a thread is finished, it retrieves the next block of loop iterations from the top of the work queue. By default, the chunk size is 1. Be

Detect clusters of circular objects by iterative adaptive thresholding and shape analysis

别来无恙 提交于 2019-12-03 03:43:44
问题 I have been developing an application to count circular objects such as bacterial colonies from pictures. What make it easy is the fact that the objects are generally well distinct from the background. However, few difficulties make the analysis tricky: The background will present gradual as well as rapid intensity change. In the edges of the container, the object will be elliptic rather than circular. The edges of the objects are sometimes rather fuzzy. The objects will cluster. The object

OpenMP: run two functions in parallel, each by half of thread pool

蹲街弑〆低调 提交于 2019-12-03 03:37:34
I have a CPU consuming function do_long that I need to run on two different datasets. do_long(data1); do_long(data2); do_long() { #pragma omp for for(...) { // do proccessing } } I have N threads available (depends on machine). How to tell OpenMP that I want that both do_long functions are run in parallel, and N/2 threads should perform the loop in first do_long and another N/2 should process second do_long ? One approach is to do it using nested parallelism: void do_long(int threads) { #pragma omp parallel for num_threads(threads) for(...) { // do proccessing } } int main(){ omp_set_nested(1)

How to set up basic openMP project in CLion [duplicate]

梦想与她 提交于 2019-12-03 03:29:06
This question already has answers here : Undefined reference to `omp_get_max_threads_' (3 answers) I am trying to run simple OpenMP program in CLion IDE . When I run it I get an ERROR: CMakeFiles\openmp_test_clion.dir/objects.a(main.cpp.obj): In function `main': D:/.../openmp_test_clion/main.cpp:9: undefined reference to 'omp_get_thread_num' collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status Here is my code: #include <stdio.h> #include <omp.h> int main() { int id; #pragma omp parallel private(id) { id = omp_get_thread_num(); printf("%d: Hello World!\n", id); } return 0; } Here is my CMakeLists.txt

OpenMP parallelizing matrix multiplication by a triple for loop (performance issue)

旧时模样 提交于 2019-12-03 03:24:58
I'm writing a program for matrix multiplication with OpenMP, that, for cache convenience, implements the multiplication A x B(transpose) rows X rows instead of the classic A x B rows x columns, for better cache efficiency. Doing this I faced an interesting fact that for me is illogic: if in this code i parallelize the extern loop the program is slower than if I put the OpenMP directives in the most inner loop, in my computer the times are 10.9 vs 8.1 seconds. //A and B are double* allocated with malloc, Nu is the lenght of the matrixes //which are square //#pragma omp parallel for for (i=0; i

Installing OpenMP on Mac OS X 10.11

匿名 (未验证) 提交于 2019-12-03 03:08:02
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试): 由 翻译 强力驱动 问题: How can I get OpenMP to run on Mac OSX 10.11, so that I can execute scripts via terminal ? I have installed OpenMP: brew install clang-omp . When I run, for example: gcc -fopenmp -o Parallel.b Parallel.c the following expression returns: fatal error: 'omp.h' file not found I have also tried: brew install gcc --without-multilib but unfortunately this eventually returned the following (after first installing some dependencies): The requested URL returned error : 404 Not Found Error : Failed to download resource "mpfr--patch" Any