openid

I played around with the new authentication features in ASP.NET MVC 5 (I previously used DotNetOpenAuth ). I understand that the built-in Google provider uses OpenID [1] (and it works fine), but I want to use my own OpenID provider when authenticating. Unfortunately, I was not able to find an easy way to accomplish this with the out-of-the-box features of ASP.NET MVC 5. I looked through the source of Microsoft.Owin.Security.Google and based on this it seems quite possible to add a new OpenID provider. Is there an easier (maybe already built-in) way to add a new OpenID provider to an ASP.NET

Firstly I understand OpenId is for authentication and OAuth is for authorisation and unlike other questions on the site I am not asking which should be used for which but whether anyone can advise a solution for my issue. I want to allow users to login to my site via their LinkedIn/Twitter/Facebook account once logged in say via LinkedIn they could also then authorise their Twitter and Facebook account as a optional login method. This would allow the user to authenticate via any of the three but end up with their user account on my site as the end result. I also want to use the authorisation

In the OpenID specs , it says: Identifier: An Identifier is just a URL. The whole flow of the OpenID Authentication protocol is about proving that an End User is, owns, a URL. Claimed Identifier: An Identifier that the End User says they own, though that has not yet been verified by the Consumer. Verified Identifier: An Identifier that the End User has proven to a Consumer that they own. Identity Provider: Also called "IdP" or "Server". This is the OpenID Authentication server that a Consumer contacts for cryptographic proof that the End User owns the Claimed Identifier. How the End User

I want to use OpenID in my Java Google App Engine web application but I don't know where to start... I have looked at openid4java and joid . openid4java says you have to place some libraries on the "endorsed libraries"-path. I don't have one locally on my computer, and I sure don't know how to do that on Google App Engine. joid looks simple enough but doesn't look up to date or something because I get a HTTP 400 back from Google when I try to get an authentication. Any pointers? http://code.google.com/p/dyuproject/ It should be pretty easy to translate http://appengine-cookbook.appspot.com

1.1跳板机 跳板机就是一台服务，开发或者运维人员在维护的过程中首先要统一登录到这台机器上，如何在登录到目标设备进行维护或操作 跳板机的缺点 1.没有实现对运维人员的行为控制和审计 服务器出现了问题，无法追责 1.2 堡垒机介绍 在一个特定网络环境下，为了保障网络和数据不受外界入侵和破坏，而运用各种技术手段实时收集和监控网咯环境中每一个组成部分的系统状态、安全事件、网络活动，以便集中报警、及时处理及审计定责。 我们又把堡垒机叫做跳板机，简易的跳板机功能简单，主要核心功能时远程登录服务器和日志审计。 比较优秀的开源软件jumpserver，认证、授权、审计、自动化、资产管理 商业堡垒机：齐治，CitrixXenApp 1.3 搭建简易堡垒机 具备堡垒机的条件时，该机器有公网和私网IP，其中私网和机房其他机器互通 设计堡垒机思路 跳板机安全设置（iptables端口限制、登录限制sshd_config） 用户、目录权限限制 1.4Jumpserver概述 Jumpserver是一款使用python，Django开发的开源跳板机系统，为了互联网企业提供了双因子认证，授权，审计自动化运维等功能。 官方地址：http://www.jumpserver.org/ 1.5 jumpserver可以实现的功能 1.6搭建Junmpserver跳板机/堡垒机 组件说明 Jumpserver

I have the DotNetOpenAuth sample provider running locally and it appears to correctly handle requests via the web browser. I can step through the handler for authorisation in the debugger. I have a project which can authenticate with Google and other providers but fails with the sample provider. The sample provider never sees a request at all and the relying party throws an exception complaining No OpenID endpoint found. Say I do the following in the relying party: string providerURL = "http://localhost/openid/provider"; // Now try the openid relying party... var openid = new

I love StackExhchange / StackOverflow's approach to integrating OpenID. As I understand it, the process goes something like this: If a user signs up with an OpenID provider (i.e. Google), StackOverflow (or similar site) creates an account for the user and associates the OpenID with that account. An existing user can associate multiple OpenID accounts with his/her StackExchange account. I would love to emulate this behavior because I haven't seen it nearly as user-friendly on other sites. I know StackExchange is built on ASP.NET MVC, but am not sure whether it uses the standard ASP.NET